Abstract 4144501: Effect of the Cardiac Myosin Activator Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: the GALACTIC-HF Trial

Introduction: The selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil (OM), has been shown to benefit individuals with HFrEF but the clinical experience of cardiac myosin activators and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is limited. We investigated the prognostic role of VA and the associations between OM, VA occurrence, and outcomes in the GALACTIC-HF trial. Methods: GALACTIC-HF was a placebo-controlled trial testing the efficacy and safety of OM in participants with symptomatic chronic HF and LVEF≤35%. VA were captured based on safety adverse event reporting. Severe HF was defined according to the ESC-HFA criteria. Poisson regression models using restricted cubic splines model were used to assess the association between baseline LVEF and incidence rates of VA. Associations between incident VA and subsequent clinical outcomes were evaluated using time-updated Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Over a median follow-up of 21.8 months, 594 out of the 8,232 individuals randomized in the GALACTIC-HF trial experienced VA, with no statistically significant differences between study arms. Individuals with lower LVEF values were at greater risk of incident VA (per 10% decline: HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.21-1.55; p<0.001) with no significant differences between study arms ( Figure, panel A ). Following VA occurrence, participants were at higher risk of the primary endpoint of CV death or HF events (adj HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.42-1.97; p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (adj HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.77-2.42; p<0.001). The treatment effects of OM on clinical outcomes were consistent in patients not experiencing VA and after VA events. Among the 2,258 participants with severe HF, OM did not affect the risk of VA (adj HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.70-1.29) and this was consistent across the range of LVEF; Figure, panel B . Conclusions: The occurrence of VA among patients with HFrEF is associated with a substantially higher risk of subsequent fatal and non-fatal events. OM did not increase the risk of VA and the beneficial treatment effects were maintained irrespective of VA occurrence. These findings reinforce the safety of OM use among individuals with HFrEF who are at risk of arrhythmic events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144501
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144501: Effect of the Cardiac Myosin Activator Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: the GALACTIC-HF Trial

Stephen B. Heitner, John R. Teerlink, G. Michael Felker, John J.V. McMurray et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4144501: Effect of the Cardiac Myosin Activator Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: the GALACTIC-HF Trial

Stephen B. Heitner, John R. Teerlink, G. Michael Felker, John J.V. McMurray, Alberto Foà, Brian Claggett, Marco Metra, Scott David Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Govini Mani, Fady I. Malik, Rafael Díaz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil (OM), has been shown to benefit individuals with HFrEF but the clinical experience of cardiac myosin activators and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is limited. We investigated the prognostic role of VA and the associations between OM, VA occurrence, and outcomes in the GALACTIC-HF trial. Methods: GALACTIC-HF was a placebo-controlled trial testing the efficacy and safety of OM in participants with symptomatic chronic HF and LVEF≤35%. VA were captured based on safety adverse event reporting. Severe HF was defined according to the ESC-HFA criteria. Poisson regression models using restricted cubic splines model were used to assess the association between baseline LVEF and incidence rates of VA. Associations between incident VA and subsequent clinical outcomes were evaluated using time-updated Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Over a median follow-up of 21.8 months, 594 out of the 8,232 individuals randomized in the GALACTIC-HF trial experienced VA, with no statistically significant differences between study arms. Individuals with lower LVEF values were at greater risk of incident VA (per 10% decline: HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.21-1.55; p<0.001) with no significant differences between study arms ( Figure, panel A ). Following VA occurrence, participants were at higher risk of the primary endpoint of CV death or HF events (adj HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.42-1.97; p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (adj HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.77-2.42; p<0.001). The treatment effects of OM on clinical outcomes were consistent in patients not experiencing VA and after VA events. Among the 2,258 participants with severe HF, OM did not affect the risk of VA (adj HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.70-1.29) and this was consistent across the range of LVEF; Figure, panel B . Conclusions: The occurrence of VA among patients with HFrEF is associated with a substantially higher risk of subsequent fatal and non-fatal events. OM did not increase the risk of VA and the beneficial treatment effects were maintained irrespective of VA occurrence. These findings reinforce the safety of OM use among individuals with HFrEF who are at risk of arrhythmic events.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), British Heart Foundation (GB), Clinical Research Institute (US), Estudios Clínicos Latinoamérica (AR), Cytokinetics (United States) (US), University of Brescia (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.