Abstract 4134327: Efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in patients with resistant hypertension receiving at least 4 antihypertensive medications including beta (β) blockers

Background: Aprocitentan, a dual ET A /ET B endothelin receptor antagonist, was recently FDA-approved for use in combination with other drugs for the treatment of hypertension not adequately controlled on other antihypertensive drugs. β-blockers are used for the prevention of cardiovascular events and have antihypertensive effects. All subjects in the PRECISION study were hypertensive at screening despite receiving ≥3 antihypertensives, with 63.5% on ≥4 and 16.8% on ≥5 antihypertensives. All were switched to a standardized fixed dose triple combination of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide; and the 456 patients (62.5% of the 730 total) who were on β-blockers at screening continued throughout the study as well. Of these, 173 (37.9%) had a history of ischemic heart disease and 106 (23.2%) a history of congestive heart failure, vs 52 (19%) and 37 (13.5%) not receiving β-blockers. This preplanned subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in patients with resistant hypertension on the triple combination with or without β-blockers. Methods: Changes from baseline (BL) in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were assessed at Week 4, the end of the double-blind treatment phase with aprocitentan 12.5 mg or 25 mg per day or placebo, and at Week 36, at the end of the single-blind aprocitentan 25 mg treatment phase. Results: There was no difference in the efficacy of aprocitentan when patients were on a β-blocker or not. In patients on β-blockers, 12.5 mg and 25 mg aprocitentan decreased SBP from BL to Week 4 by mean -14.9 mmHg and -14.9 mmHg, respectively, vs -11.2 mmHg in the placebo group; and in patients without β-blockers by -16.5 mmHg and -14.9 mmHg vs -11.8 mmHg. Similar results were seen at Week 36, as compared with BL for both subgroups, and at Week 4 for DBP (Table 1). In patients on β-blockers, the incidence of edema/fluid retention at Week 4 was 9.9%, 19.3% and 2.8% in the aprocitentan 12.5 mg, 25 mg and placebo groups, respectively, as compared with 7.6%, 16.7%, and 1.0% in patients without β-blockers. In both subgroups, most events occurred during the first 8 weeks of treatment. The incidence of edema/fluid retention with aprocitentan was comparable with that of the placebo group in both subgroups thereafter. Conclusions: Aprocitentan is effective in lowering BP and has a good safety and tolerability profile in patients with resistant hypertension who are taking 4 or more antihypertensive drugs including β-blockers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4134327
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4134327: Efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in patients with resistant hypertension receiving at least 4 antihypertensive medications including beta (β) blockers

George L. Bakris, Ajay Ahuja, John M. Flack, Markus Peter Schlaich et al.
Circulation
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Abstract 4134327: Efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in patients with resistant hypertension receiving at least 4 antihypertensive medications including beta (β) blockers

George L. Bakris, Ajay Ahuja, John M. Flack, Markus Peter Schlaich, Mouna Sassi-Sayadi, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Ji-Guang Wang, MA Weber
article en

Abstract

Background: Aprocitentan, a dual ET A /ET B endothelin receptor antagonist, was recently FDA-approved for use in combination with other drugs for the treatment of hypertension not adequately controlled on other antihypertensive drugs. β-blockers are used for the prevention of cardiovascular events and have antihypertensive effects. All subjects in the PRECISION study were hypertensive at screening despite receiving ≥3 antihypertensives, with 63.5% on ≥4 and 16.8% on ≥5 antihypertensives. All were switched to a standardized fixed dose triple combination of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide; and the 456 patients (62.5% of the 730 total) who were on β-blockers at screening continued throughout the study as well. Of these, 173 (37.9%) had a history of ischemic heart disease and 106 (23.2%) a history of congestive heart failure, vs 52 (19%) and 37 (13.5%) not receiving β-blockers. This preplanned subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of aprocitentan in patients with resistant hypertension on the triple combination with or without β-blockers. Methods: Changes from baseline (BL) in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were assessed at Week 4, the end of the double-blind treatment phase with aprocitentan 12.5 mg or 25 mg per day or placebo, and at Week 36, at the end of the single-blind aprocitentan 25 mg treatment phase. Results: There was no difference in the efficacy of aprocitentan when patients were on a β-blocker or not. In patients on β-blockers, 12.5 mg and 25 mg aprocitentan decreased SBP from BL to Week 4 by mean -14.9 mmHg and -14.9 mmHg, respectively, vs -11.2 mmHg in the placebo group; and in patients without β-blockers by -16.5 mmHg and -14.9 mmHg vs -11.8 mmHg. Similar results were seen at Week 36, as compared with BL for both subgroups, and at Week 4 for DBP (Table 1). In patients on β-blockers, the incidence of edema/fluid retention at Week 4 was 9.9%, 19.3% and 2.8% in the aprocitentan 12.5 mg, 25 mg and placebo groups, respectively, as compared with 7.6%, 16.7%, and 1.0% in patients without β-blockers. In both subgroups, most events occurred during the first 8 weeks of treatment. The incidence of edema/fluid retention with aprocitentan was comparable with that of the placebo group in both subgroups thereafter. Conclusions: Aprocitentan is effective in lowering BP and has a good safety and tolerability profile in patients with resistant hypertension who are taking 4 or more antihypertensive drugs including β-blockers.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
The University of Western Australia (AU), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (US), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Idorsia (Switzerland) (CH), Idera Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.