Abstract 4141448: Evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis with cardiac MRI and association with endomyocardial biopsy findings

Introduction: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) observed on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as a potential indicator of myocardial involvement in cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, discerning which LGE patterns in amyloidosis distinguish it from other cardiomyopathies remains unclear. This study aims to compare LGE characteristics in a predominantly African American cohort who underwent endomyocardial biopsies. Despite advancements in cardiac imaging techniques, the endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for amyloidosis diagnosis. Insights garnered from this analysis could enhance diagnostic precision and facilitate earlier detection. Methods: In this retrospective study at MedStar Union Memorial Hospital in Baltimore, MD, patients who underwent both endomyocardial biopsy and CMR were included. The study compared individuals with biopsy-proven amyloidosis (both AL and ATTR) to those with negative biopsy results. LGE patterns were selected based on their frequent use in CMR interpretation. Statistical analysis employed Pearson chi-square and t-tests. Results: The cohort comprised 42 patients who underwent biopsy, with 13 patients (31%) with positive biopsy results. Among them, 24 were men (57%), and 81% identified as African American. Demographic, anthropomorphic, and objective clinical findings are detailed in Table 1. The average age of the cohort was 68 years, with those with biopsy-proven amyloidosis significantly older (75 vs. 61 years, p = 0.002). Although the biopsy-positive group exhibited a lower absolute NT-pro-BNP, the difference was not statistically significant. The most prevalent LGE patterns among the biopsy-positive group were diffuse (62%) and basal (31%). Notably, 69% of biopsy-positive patients exhibited an LGE pattern described as infiltrative. However, 38% of the biopsy-negative group also manifested infiltrative patterns on LGE, a difference not statistically significant compared to the biopsy-positive group. The positive predictive value of an infiltrative LGE pattern was low (45%). Conclusion: This study compares CMR LGE patterns in biopsy proven CA. Despite findings of an infiltrative LGE pattern on CMR, when using endomyocardial biopsy as the gold standard, the positive predictive value of LGE in differentiating CA patients was low. Further research and larger studies are warranted to explore additional imaging modalities or biomarkers that may complement or refine the diagnostic algorithm for CA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141448
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141448: Evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis with cardiac MRI and association with endomyocardial biopsy findings

Yakubu Bene‐Alhasan, Adhvithi Pingili, Nicholas Huerta, Taha Khalid et al.
Circulation
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Abstract 4141448: Evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis with cardiac MRI and association with endomyocardial biopsy findings

Yakubu Bene‐Alhasan, Adhvithi Pingili, Nicholas Huerta, Taha Khalid, Bethel Woldu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) observed on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as a potential indicator of myocardial involvement in cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, discerning which LGE patterns in amyloidosis distinguish it from other cardiomyopathies remains unclear. This study aims to compare LGE characteristics in a predominantly African American cohort who underwent endomyocardial biopsies. Despite advancements in cardiac imaging techniques, the endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for amyloidosis diagnosis. Insights garnered from this analysis could enhance diagnostic precision and facilitate earlier detection. Methods: In this retrospective study at MedStar Union Memorial Hospital in Baltimore, MD, patients who underwent both endomyocardial biopsy and CMR were included. The study compared individuals with biopsy-proven amyloidosis (both AL and ATTR) to those with negative biopsy results. LGE patterns were selected based on their frequent use in CMR interpretation. Statistical analysis employed Pearson chi-square and t-tests. Results: The cohort comprised 42 patients who underwent biopsy, with 13 patients (31%) with positive biopsy results. Among them, 24 were men (57%), and 81% identified as African American. Demographic, anthropomorphic, and objective clinical findings are detailed in Table 1. The average age of the cohort was 68 years, with those with biopsy-proven amyloidosis significantly older (75 vs. 61 years, p = 0.002). Although the biopsy-positive group exhibited a lower absolute NT-pro-BNP, the difference was not statistically significant. The most prevalent LGE patterns among the biopsy-positive group were diffuse (62%) and basal (31%). Notably, 69% of biopsy-positive patients exhibited an LGE pattern described as infiltrative. However, 38% of the biopsy-negative group also manifested infiltrative patterns on LGE, a difference not statistically significant compared to the biopsy-positive group. The positive predictive value of an infiltrative LGE pattern was low (45%). Conclusion: This study compares CMR LGE patterns in biopsy proven CA. Despite findings of an infiltrative LGE pattern on CMR, when using endomyocardial biopsy as the gold standard, the positive predictive value of LGE in differentiating CA patients was low. Further research and larger studies are warranted to explore additional imaging modalities or biomarkers that may complement or refine the diagnostic algorithm for CA.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.