Abstract 4148073: Expect the Unexpected: Type A Aortic Dissection in Pregnant Patient with Marfan Syndrome

Case Description: A 26 yo woman with Marfan Syndrome (MFS, FBN1 ), ectopia lentis, aortic dilation and no family history of MFS or aortic dissection was evaluated for preconception counseling. She was asymptomatic, and the size of her aortic root (~4cm) and ascending aorta (~3.5cm) had been stable for over 5 years. She was counseled that risk of cardiac events during her pregnancy is high, but lower compared to those with aortic sizes >4.5cm. Once pregnant, she was followed closely with imaging every trimester (MRA at 25 weeks gestation showed stable aortic sizes). Cardio-obstetric recommendations included: CARPREG II score: 2, mWHO class: III, consideration of assisted second stage due to aortic root dilation. She was counseled on symptoms of aortic dissection and to seek emergency care should those symptoms arise. At 27 weeks gestation, she presented to the ED with intense chest and neck pain, shortness of breath, and headache. Emergent CT showed aortic root (4.1cm) and proximal ascending aortic dissection with propagation into the left main coronary artery (Figure 1). She underwent emergent C-section followed by aortic root and ascending aorta replacement and mechanical aortic valve replacement due to severe regurgitation. She was discharged in stable condition 8 days after an uncomplicated post-operative recovery. Her baby is recovering in the NICU. Discussion: While risk of aortic dissection in women with MFS is higher during pregnancy, recent studies suggest relative safety with aortic root diameters up to 4.5cm. Our case highlights that even at “lower risk” aortic sizes, aortic dissection remains an important risk for such women. Educating patients and providers about the acute symptoms of aortic dissection and forming an action plan for timely intervention can be lifesaving. Furthermore, some genetic mutations (e.g. TGBR1/2 or SMAD3 ) and sequence variants within the FBN1 gene may pose a higher risk of aortic dissection at smaller aortic diameters. Our patient’s pathogenic FBN1 mutation (-c.2114-5T>G, previously classified as a VUS) highlights the importance of genetic testing: prophylactic surgery at sizes <4.5cm may be considered with high-risk genetic variants or a family history of aortic dissection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4148073
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4148073: Expect the Unexpected: Type A Aortic Dissection in Pregnant Patient with Marfan Syndrome

Lauren Lastinger, Saurabh Rajpal, Lauren Stucky
Circulation
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
article

Abstract 4148073: Expect the Unexpected: Type A Aortic Dissection in Pregnant Patient with Marfan Syndrome

Lauren Lastinger, Saurabh Rajpal, Lauren Stucky
article en

Abstract

Case Description: A 26 yo woman with Marfan Syndrome (MFS, FBN1 ), ectopia lentis, aortic dilation and no family history of MFS or aortic dissection was evaluated for preconception counseling. She was asymptomatic, and the size of her aortic root (~4cm) and ascending aorta (~3.5cm) had been stable for over 5 years. She was counseled that risk of cardiac events during her pregnancy is high, but lower compared to those with aortic sizes >4.5cm. Once pregnant, she was followed closely with imaging every trimester (MRA at 25 weeks gestation showed stable aortic sizes). Cardio-obstetric recommendations included: CARPREG II score: 2, mWHO class: III, consideration of assisted second stage due to aortic root dilation. She was counseled on symptoms of aortic dissection and to seek emergency care should those symptoms arise. At 27 weeks gestation, she presented to the ED with intense chest and neck pain, shortness of breath, and headache. Emergent CT showed aortic root (4.1cm) and proximal ascending aortic dissection with propagation into the left main coronary artery (Figure 1). She underwent emergent C-section followed by aortic root and ascending aorta replacement and mechanical aortic valve replacement due to severe regurgitation. She was discharged in stable condition 8 days after an uncomplicated post-operative recovery. Her baby is recovering in the NICU. Discussion: While risk of aortic dissection in women with MFS is higher during pregnancy, recent studies suggest relative safety with aortic root diameters up to 4.5cm. Our case highlights that even at “lower risk” aortic sizes, aortic dissection remains an important risk for such women. Educating patients and providers about the acute symptoms of aortic dissection and forming an action plan for timely intervention can be lifesaving. Furthermore, some genetic mutations (e.g. TGBR1/2 or SMAD3 ) and sequence variants within the FBN1 gene may pose a higher risk of aortic dissection at smaller aortic diameters. Our patient’s pathogenic FBN1 mutation (-c.2114-5T>G, previously classified as a VUS) highlights the importance of genetic testing: prophylactic surgery at sizes <4.5cm may be considered with high-risk genetic variants or a family history of aortic dissection.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.