Abstract 4144595: Real-World Outcomes of Impella 5.5 in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Heart Transplant

Background: Impella 5.5 provides robust support as temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) device in advanced heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock. Understanding short- and long-term outcomes is crucial. Hypothesis: Impella 5.5 supports advanced heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock and successfully bridges them to cardiac replacement without affecting long-term survival. Methods: From February 2020 to April 2024, all patients who received an Impella 5.5 and underwent evaluation for advanced therapies at Houston Methodist Hospital were identified. Implantation of Heartmate 3 (HM3) Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), mortality, and device removal after Impella implantation were assessed. For HM3 LVAD patients, outcomes were categorized as death, transplantation, or survival. Survival after OHT was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared to patients who received OHT without Impella 5.5. Cumulative incidence rates was calculated using Competing risk regression. Results: 140 patients were identified, median age 59.4 years (50.4-66.5), majority Caucasian (54%) and Black (36%). 89 (63.6%) were either bridged to advanced therapies or recovered. 52 (37.1%) underwent OHT, 21 (15%) received an HM3 LVAD, and 51 (36.4%) died post-implantation. 3 (2.1%) died post-transplant. Post-LVAD, 6 (4.3%) died, 3 (2.1%) underwent OHT, and 12 (8.6%) were alive with LVAD. 10 (7.1%) survived after Impella 5.5 removal, 2 (1.4%) went to hospice, and 1 (0.7%) was transferred to another hospital. 3 (2.1%) are currently hospitalized. Fig1a shows outcomes. Fig1b indicates death within 90 days of Impella implantation. 3-year survival of patients bridged with Impella to OHT (N=55) was 94%, comparable (p=0.27) to patients receiving OHT without Impella (N=215)(Fig 1c). Conclusion: Mortality for cardiogenic shock patients remains high. Using Impella 5.5 with a cardiac replacement strategy can salvage some patients. Long-term outcomes for patients bridged to heart transplant with Impella 5.5 are similar to those without the device. Further studies on predictors of early adverse outcomes post-implant can help mitigate risks for advanced heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144595
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144595: Real-World Outcomes of Impella 5.5 in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Heart Transplant

Arvind Bhimaraj, N.W. Uy, Khush Patel, Ashrith Guha et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4144595: Real-World Outcomes of Impella 5.5 in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Heart Transplant

Arvind Bhimaraj, N.W. Uy, Khush Patel, Ashrith Guha, Mehmet H. Akay, Erik E. Suarez, Ju H. Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: Impella 5.5 provides robust support as temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) device in advanced heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock. Understanding short- and long-term outcomes is crucial. Hypothesis: Impella 5.5 supports advanced heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock and successfully bridges them to cardiac replacement without affecting long-term survival. Methods: From February 2020 to April 2024, all patients who received an Impella 5.5 and underwent evaluation for advanced therapies at Houston Methodist Hospital were identified. Implantation of Heartmate 3 (HM3) Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), mortality, and device removal after Impella implantation were assessed. For HM3 LVAD patients, outcomes were categorized as death, transplantation, or survival. Survival after OHT was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared to patients who received OHT without Impella 5.5. Cumulative incidence rates was calculated using Competing risk regression. Results: 140 patients were identified, median age 59.4 years (50.4-66.5), majority Caucasian (54%) and Black (36%). 89 (63.6%) were either bridged to advanced therapies or recovered. 52 (37.1%) underwent OHT, 21 (15%) received an HM3 LVAD, and 51 (36.4%) died post-implantation. 3 (2.1%) died post-transplant. Post-LVAD, 6 (4.3%) died, 3 (2.1%) underwent OHT, and 12 (8.6%) were alive with LVAD. 10 (7.1%) survived after Impella 5.5 removal, 2 (1.4%) went to hospice, and 1 (0.7%) was transferred to another hospital. 3 (2.1%) are currently hospitalized. Fig1a shows outcomes. Fig1b indicates death within 90 days of Impella implantation. 3-year survival of patients bridged with Impella to OHT (N=55) was 94%, comparable (p=0.27) to patients receiving OHT without Impella (N=215)(Fig 1c). Conclusion: Mortality for cardiogenic shock patients remains high. Using Impella 5.5 with a cardiac replacement strategy can salvage some patients. Long-term outcomes for patients bridged to heart transplant with Impella 5.5 are similar to those without the device. Further studies on predictors of early adverse outcomes post-implant can help mitigate risks for advanced heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Methodist Hospital (US), Cardiovascular Research Associates (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.