Abstract 4144553: Fully Automated Machine Learning Based Echocardiographic Assessment of Global Longitudinal Strain in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Cardiotoxic Chemotherapy

Background: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is considered the most sensitive echocardiographic marker for detecting cardiotoxicity and subclinical changes in cardiac function in patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies. Despite literature that has shown less inter-observer variability for GLS compared to left ventricular ejection fraction, there remains significant variability in GLS measurement across observers and vendors. US2.AI is a novel, machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for automated echocardiographic interpretation. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of AI-based GLS assessment and hypothesize that AI-based GLS measurement is more reproducible compared to human-based measurement Methods: A total of 27 transthoracic echocardiograms were selected at random from a population of female cardio-oncology breast cancer patients and were run through the US2.AI algorithm twice to calculate GLS. The same echocardiograms were then analyzed by two board-certified cardiologists in a blinded fashion to calculate GLS using QLAB software (Philips). The two methods of GLS measurement (AI versus humans) were compared using linear regression, as assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. Reproducibility for each method was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 27 studies were analyzed with a mean age of 55.6 ± 11.3 and all patients were female. The feasibility of US2.AI for the assessment of GLS was demonstrated with a strong correlation between AI-based and human reads (r = 0.80, p < 0.00001). The reproducibility of AI-based GLS assessment was superior to that of human readers as assessed by an ICC of 1.0 versus 0.52, respectively. Conclusion: AI-based assessment of GLS was shown to be both feasible and more reproducible compared to expert human readers in a population of breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Given the important clinical implications of GLS in cardio-oncology patients, more widespread implementation of AI-based strain assessment has the potential to significantly improve the reproducibility of GLS measurement in this unique patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144553
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144553: Fully Automated Machine Learning Based Echocardiographic Assessment of Global Longitudinal Strain in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Cardiotoxic Chemotherapy

Ilya Karagodin, Thriveni Sanagala, Kifah Hussain, Romil Patel et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
0.40
article

Abstract 4144553: Fully Automated Machine Learning Based Echocardiographic Assessment of Global Longitudinal Strain in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Cardiotoxic Chemotherapy

Ilya Karagodin, Thriveni Sanagala, Kifah Hussain, Romil Patel, Jason Robin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is considered the most sensitive echocardiographic marker for detecting cardiotoxicity and subclinical changes in cardiac function in patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies. Despite literature that has shown less inter-observer variability for GLS compared to left ventricular ejection fraction, there remains significant variability in GLS measurement across observers and vendors. US2.AI is a novel, machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for automated echocardiographic interpretation. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of AI-based GLS assessment and hypothesize that AI-based GLS measurement is more reproducible compared to human-based measurement Methods: A total of 27 transthoracic echocardiograms were selected at random from a population of female cardio-oncology breast cancer patients and were run through the US2.AI algorithm twice to calculate GLS. The same echocardiograms were then analyzed by two board-certified cardiologists in a blinded fashion to calculate GLS using QLAB software (Philips). The two methods of GLS measurement (AI versus humans) were compared using linear regression, as assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient. Reproducibility for each method was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 27 studies were analyzed with a mean age of 55.6 ± 11.3 and all patients were female. The feasibility of US2.AI for the assessment of GLS was demonstrated with a strong correlation between AI-based and human reads (r = 0.80, p < 0.00001). The reproducibility of AI-based GLS assessment was superior to that of human readers as assessed by an ICC of 1.0 versus 0.52, respectively. Conclusion: AI-based assessment of GLS was shown to be both feasible and more reproducible compared to expert human readers in a population of breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Given the important clinical implications of GLS in cardio-oncology patients, more widespread implementation of AI-based strain assessment has the potential to significantly improve the reproducibility of GLS measurement in this unique patient population.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Chicago (US), Evanston Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.