Abstract 4123637: Prevalence of Invasively Diagnosed Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients with Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Flow Reserve: The Systematically Missed Diagnosis on Non-invasive Testing

Background: Invasive coronary reactivity testing (CRT) is the gold standard for comprehensive assessment of coronary endothelial and microvascular dysfunction in patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD (ANOCA). Non-invasive imaging modalities (PET and CMR) have emerged as potential alternatives. However, due to the inability to systemically administer acetylcholine, patients with normal coronary flow reserve (CFR) but abnormal endothelial function on invasive Ach testing are systemically missed on non-invasive testing. We aimed to assess the prevalence of coronary endothelial dysfunction in ANOCA patients with normal CFR. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing CRT at our institution were included. Those with normal adenosine-based CFR (>2.5), were further stratified as having normal coronary endothelial function (NEF, <20% epicardial coronary diameter constriction and >50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to ACh) vs abnormal endothelial function (AEF, >20% epicardial coronary diameter constriction and/or <50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to Ach). We then assessed the proportion of AEF patients who would have been otherwise diagnosed with normal coronary physiology based on CFR alone on non-invasive testing. Results: 37 patients underwent CRT. Mean age was 55 years ± 25, 68% were females. 25 out of 37 patients (68%) had normal CFR. Of those patients, 17 (68%) patients had AEF. Distribution of coronary epicardial vs microvascular endothelial dysfunction is represented in Fig. 1. Conclusion: 68% of ANOCA patients with normal CFR had coronary epicardial and/or microvascular endothelial dysfunction and would have otherwise been labeled as ‘normal coronary physiology’ by non-invasive microvascular function testing. Our findings re-enforce the need for comprehensive invasive CRT for accurate comprehensive diagnosis of patients with ANOCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4123637
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4123637: Prevalence of Invasively Diagnosed Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients with Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Flow Reserve: The Systematically Missed Diagnosis on Non-invasive Testing

Sharanyah Srinivasan, Michel Corban, Saad Kubba, Alvaro Altamirano et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4123637: Prevalence of Invasively Diagnosed Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients with Chest Pain and Normal Coronary Flow Reserve: The Systematically Missed Diagnosis on Non-invasive Testing

Sharanyah Srinivasan, Michel Corban, Saad Kubba, Alvaro Altamirano, Sai Krishna Bhogadi
article en

Abstract

Background: Invasive coronary reactivity testing (CRT) is the gold standard for comprehensive assessment of coronary endothelial and microvascular dysfunction in patients with angina and non-obstructive CAD (ANOCA). Non-invasive imaging modalities (PET and CMR) have emerged as potential alternatives. However, due to the inability to systemically administer acetylcholine, patients with normal coronary flow reserve (CFR) but abnormal endothelial function on invasive Ach testing are systemically missed on non-invasive testing. We aimed to assess the prevalence of coronary endothelial dysfunction in ANOCA patients with normal CFR. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing CRT at our institution were included. Those with normal adenosine-based CFR (>2.5), were further stratified as having normal coronary endothelial function (NEF, <20% epicardial coronary diameter constriction and >50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to ACh) vs abnormal endothelial function (AEF, >20% epicardial coronary diameter constriction and/or <50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to Ach). We then assessed the proportion of AEF patients who would have been otherwise diagnosed with normal coronary physiology based on CFR alone on non-invasive testing. Results: 37 patients underwent CRT. Mean age was 55 years ± 25, 68% were females. 25 out of 37 patients (68%) had normal CFR. Of those patients, 17 (68%) patients had AEF. Distribution of coronary epicardial vs microvascular endothelial dysfunction is represented in Fig. 1. Conclusion: 68% of ANOCA patients with normal CFR had coronary epicardial and/or microvascular endothelial dysfunction and would have otherwise been labeled as ‘normal coronary physiology’ by non-invasive microvascular function testing. Our findings re-enforce the need for comprehensive invasive CRT for accurate comprehensive diagnosis of patients with ANOCA.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Arizona (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.