Abstract 4144529: Cardiac Allograft Hypertrophy (CAH) at 6 Months Post Transplant Is a Prognostic Marker of Long-Term Outcomes: Are We Missing a Simple Biomarker?

Introduction: Cardiac hypertrophy is a known adverse prognostic marker in various non-transplant pathologies. In heart transplant patients, due to many confounders, it has been controversial on the relevance and timing of cardiac hypertrophy as an adverse remodeling vs acute injury pattern in an immunologically hostile environment. Previous studies have shown prognostication of hypertrophy on echocardiogram at 1-year post-heart transplant. Research Questions: Does cardiac hypertrophy within a year after transplant have long-term prognostic implications? Methods: We collected relevant clinical variables for all heart transplants using EPIC EHR’s Clarity database. Hypertrophy was defined based on LV Mass Indexed to body surface area where LV Mass = 0.8 x (1.04 x (((LVIDD + IVSd + PWd) 3 - LVIDD 3 ))) + 0.6. Relative Wall Thickness was defined as RWT = 2 x PWd / LVIDD. We used a rule-based natural language processing program validated by correlation with manual readings by trained cardiologists (r=0.96, p=0.007) to abstract echo variables. Results: Inclusion criteria were heart transplants performed from 2015 to 2023 at our center, with an echocardiogram closest to 6 months (+/- 1 month). Ten percent (n=33) showed hypertrophy on echocardiograms at 6 months (Table 1). Of these, 20 (61%) had mild, 3 (9%) severe, and 10 (30%) moderate hypertrophy. Of 33 patients, 28 (85%) had concentric, and 5 (15%) had eccentric hypertrophy. Patients with hypertrophy at 6 months had significantly worse survival at 5 years (p=0.01) and 10 years (p=0.05) compared to patients without hypertrophy (Fig 1). Survival at 5 and 10 years was not statistically different for patients with hypertrophy at 3 months (5 yrs p=0.17, 10 yrs p=0.06), 12 months (5 yrs p=0.38, 10 yrs p=0.30), and 18 months (5 yrs p=0.15, 10 yrs p=0.08) compared to those without hypertrophy. Conclusion: Cardiac hypertrophy on echocardiogram at 6 months predicts adverse long-term survival, while other time points did not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144529
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144529: Cardiac Allograft Hypertrophy (CAH) at 6 Months Post Transplant Is a Prognostic Marker of Long-Term Outcomes: Are We Missing a Simple Biomarker?

Arvind Bhimaraj, Khush Patel, Vanishree Nandakumar, Rajul Ranka et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4144529: Cardiac Allograft Hypertrophy (CAH) at 6 Months Post Transplant Is a Prognostic Marker of Long-Term Outcomes: Are We Missing a Simple Biomarker?

Arvind Bhimaraj, Khush Patel, Vanishree Nandakumar, Rajul Ranka, Guillermo Torre‐Amione
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac hypertrophy is a known adverse prognostic marker in various non-transplant pathologies. In heart transplant patients, due to many confounders, it has been controversial on the relevance and timing of cardiac hypertrophy as an adverse remodeling vs acute injury pattern in an immunologically hostile environment. Previous studies have shown prognostication of hypertrophy on echocardiogram at 1-year post-heart transplant. Research Questions: Does cardiac hypertrophy within a year after transplant have long-term prognostic implications? Methods: We collected relevant clinical variables for all heart transplants using EPIC EHR’s Clarity database. Hypertrophy was defined based on LV Mass Indexed to body surface area where LV Mass = 0.8 x (1.04 x (((LVIDD + IVSd + PWd) 3 - LVIDD 3 ))) + 0.6. Relative Wall Thickness was defined as RWT = 2 x PWd / LVIDD. We used a rule-based natural language processing program validated by correlation with manual readings by trained cardiologists (r=0.96, p=0.007) to abstract echo variables. Results: Inclusion criteria were heart transplants performed from 2015 to 2023 at our center, with an echocardiogram closest to 6 months (+/- 1 month). Ten percent (n=33) showed hypertrophy on echocardiograms at 6 months (Table 1). Of these, 20 (61%) had mild, 3 (9%) severe, and 10 (30%) moderate hypertrophy. Of 33 patients, 28 (85%) had concentric, and 5 (15%) had eccentric hypertrophy. Patients with hypertrophy at 6 months had significantly worse survival at 5 years (p=0.01) and 10 years (p=0.05) compared to patients without hypertrophy (Fig 1). Survival at 5 and 10 years was not statistically different for patients with hypertrophy at 3 months (5 yrs p=0.17, 10 yrs p=0.06), 12 months (5 yrs p=0.38, 10 yrs p=0.30), and 18 months (5 yrs p=0.15, 10 yrs p=0.08) compared to those without hypertrophy. Conclusion: Cardiac hypertrophy on echocardiogram at 6 months predicts adverse long-term survival, while other time points did not.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Houston Methodist (US), Methodist Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.