Abstract 4119554: Septal Thickness has a Variable Effect on Shock Incidence Rate by ICD Indication in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Introduction: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cardiomyopathy. People with HCM are at risk of cardiac arrest. ACC/AHA guideline-supported indications for ICD placement include cardiac arrest or VT, family history of sudden cardiac death in a close relative ≤50, massive septal hypertrophy (MSH - septal thickness ≥30mm), apical pouch, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Methods: People attending any Mayo Clinic site on > 1 occasion who underwent ICD placement for HCM who had documented cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) results were included in the study from time of ICD placement to last device interrogation. Outcome was incidence rate of first appropriate shock. Multivariable cox regression was used to examine the association between septal thickness and shock rate, controlling for current age, sex and secondary vs primary prevention device. An interaction term for association between septal thickness and each ICD indication in turn was incorporated into regression, and stratum specific estimates produced using linear computation. Results: 326 people were included in the study, of whom 50 experienced at least one appropriate ICD shock over 1,487.95 person years (incidence rate 3.36 per 100 person years, NNT 29.76 per year). MSH was strongly associated with shock rate (HR 2.29 [1.19 to 4.40], p=0.013). In people without MSH, there was a 50% reduction in shocks where a subjective measure (syncope or family history of sudden cardiac death) was present (table 1). In this cohort, NSVT resulted in a threefold increase in incidence of shock (HR 3.15 [1.446 to 6.47], p=0.003). In the presence of MSH, there was a four-fold increase in shock rate in people who underwent ICD insertion for family history of sudden cardiac death or for syncope (table 2). There was no difference in shock rates in people with NSVT prior to ICD placement based on septal thickness (HR 0.76 [0.21 to 2.74], p=0.679). There was strong evidence of interaction between NSVT and MSH on shock rates (LR χ2 =6.94, p=0.008), such that presence of both risk factors did not increase shock rate. Concurrent presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) >15% on CMR and MSH was associated with a significant increase in shock rate (3.58 [1.43 to 8.98], p=0.006). Conclusion: MSH is a helpful indicator of who will benefit from ICD placement among people with a pre-existing indication for a device, particularly among those with a more subjective indication for a device.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4119554
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4119554: Septal Thickness has a Variable Effect on Shock Incidence Rate by ICD Indication in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Srekar Ravi, Said Alsidawi, Michael O’Shea, Omar Baqal et al.
Circulation
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Abstract 4119554: Septal Thickness has a Variable Effect on Shock Incidence Rate by ICD Indication in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Srekar Ravi, Said Alsidawi, Michael O’Shea, Omar Baqal, Bade Fatunde
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cardiomyopathy. People with HCM are at risk of cardiac arrest. ACC/AHA guideline-supported indications for ICD placement include cardiac arrest or VT, family history of sudden cardiac death in a close relative ≤50, massive septal hypertrophy (MSH - septal thickness ≥30mm), apical pouch, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Methods: People attending any Mayo Clinic site on > 1 occasion who underwent ICD placement for HCM who had documented cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) results were included in the study from time of ICD placement to last device interrogation. Outcome was incidence rate of first appropriate shock. Multivariable cox regression was used to examine the association between septal thickness and shock rate, controlling for current age, sex and secondary vs primary prevention device. An interaction term for association between septal thickness and each ICD indication in turn was incorporated into regression, and stratum specific estimates produced using linear computation. Results: 326 people were included in the study, of whom 50 experienced at least one appropriate ICD shock over 1,487.95 person years (incidence rate 3.36 per 100 person years, NNT 29.76 per year). MSH was strongly associated with shock rate (HR 2.29 [1.19 to 4.40], p=0.013). In people without MSH, there was a 50% reduction in shocks where a subjective measure (syncope or family history of sudden cardiac death) was present (table 1). In this cohort, NSVT resulted in a threefold increase in incidence of shock (HR 3.15 [1.446 to 6.47], p=0.003). In the presence of MSH, there was a four-fold increase in shock rate in people who underwent ICD insertion for family history of sudden cardiac death or for syncope (table 2). There was no difference in shock rates in people with NSVT prior to ICD placement based on septal thickness (HR 0.76 [0.21 to 2.74], p=0.679). There was strong evidence of interaction between NSVT and MSH on shock rates (LR χ2 =6.94, p=0.008), such that presence of both risk factors did not increase shock rate. Concurrent presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) >15% on CMR and MSH was associated with a significant increase in shock rate (3.58 [1.43 to 8.98], p=0.006). Conclusion: MSH is a helpful indicator of who will benefit from ICD placement among people with a pre-existing indication for a device, particularly among those with a more subjective indication for a device.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.