Genomic evaluation of residual feed intake in US Holstein cows: insights into lifetime feed efficiency

Residual feed intake (RFI) is an important trait of feed efficiency that has been increasingly considered in the breeding objectives for dairy cattle. The objectives of this study were to estimate the genetic parameters of RFI and its component traits, namely, dry-matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), and energy-corrected milk (ECM), in lactating Holstein cows; we thus developed a system for genomic evaluation of RFI in lactating Holstein cows and explored the associations of the RFI of heifers and cows. The RFI values were calculated from 2,538 first (n = 2,118) and second (n = 420) lactation Holsteins cows between 2020 and 2024 as part of the STgenetics EcoFeed<sup>®</sup> program. Of the animals, 1,516 were heifers from the same research station with previously established RFI values . After quality control, 61,283 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were used for the analyses. Univariate analyses were performed to estimate the heritabilities of RFI and its components in lactating cows; bivariate analyses were then performed to estimate the genetic correlations between the RFI of heifers and lactating cows using the genomic best unbiased linear prediction method. Animals with phenotypes and genotypes were used as the training population, and animals with only genotypes were considered the prediction population. The reliability of breeding values was obtained by approximation based on partitioning a function of the accuracy of the training population's genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) and magnitudes of genomic relationships between the individuals in the training and prediction populations. The heritability estimates (mean ± SE) of the RFI, DMI, ECM, and BW were 0.43 ± 0.07, 0.44 ± 0.04, 0.40 ± 0.05, and 0.46 ± 0.04, respectively. The average reliability of the GEBVs for RFI from the training and prediction populations were 44% and 30%, respectively. The genetic correlations for the RFI were 0.42 ± 0.08 between heifers and first lactation cows and 0.34 ± 0.06 between heifers and first and second lactation cows. Our results show that the genetic components of RFI are not fully carried over from heifers to cows and that there is re-ranking of the individuals at different life stages. Selection of animals for feed efficiency on a lifetime basis thus requires accounting for the efficiencies during animal growth and milk production as a lactating cow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1462306
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic evaluation of residual feed intake in US Holstein cows: insights into lifetime feed efficiency

Piush Khanal, N. Deeb, Gabriela Canabrava Gouveia, Pablo J. Ross et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Genetics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.10
article

Genomic evaluation of residual feed intake in US Holstein cows: insights into lifetime feed efficiency

Piush Khanal, N. Deeb, Gabriela Canabrava Gouveia, Pablo J. Ross, Adam Taiti Harth Utsunomiya, J. W. Johnson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Residual feed intake (RFI) is an important trait of feed efficiency that has been increasingly considered in the breeding objectives for dairy cattle. The objectives of this study were to estimate the genetic parameters of RFI and its component traits, namely, dry-matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), and energy-corrected milk (ECM), in lactating Holstein cows; we thus developed a system for genomic evaluation of RFI in lactating Holstein cows and explored the associations of the RFI of heifers and cows. The RFI values were calculated from 2,538 first (n = 2,118) and second (n = 420) lactation Holsteins cows between 2020 and 2024 as part of the STgenetics EcoFeed<sup>®</sup> program. Of the animals, 1,516 were heifers from the same research station with previously established RFI values . After quality control, 61,283 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were used for the analyses. Univariate analyses were performed to estimate the heritabilities of RFI and its components in lactating cows; bivariate analyses were then performed to estimate the genetic correlations between the RFI of heifers and lactating cows using the genomic best unbiased linear prediction method. Animals with phenotypes and genotypes were used as the training population, and animals with only genotypes were considered the prediction population. The reliability of breeding values was obtained by approximation based on partitioning a function of the accuracy of the training population's genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) and magnitudes of genomic relationships between the individuals in the training and prediction populations. The heritability estimates (mean ± SE) of the RFI, DMI, ECM, and BW were 0.43 ± 0.07, 0.44 ± 0.04, 0.40 ± 0.05, and 0.46 ± 0.04, respectively. The average reliability of the GEBVs for RFI from the training and prediction populations were 44% and 30%, respectively. The genetic correlations for the RFI were 0.42 ± 0.08 between heifers and first lactation cows and 0.34 ± 0.06 between heifers and first and second lactation cows. Our results show that the genetic components of RFI are not fully carried over from heifers to cows and that there is re-ranking of the individuals at different life stages. Selection of animals for feed efficiency on a lifetime basis thus requires accounting for the efficiencies during animal growth and milk production as a lactating cow.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 15
STgenetics (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.