Abstract 4143239: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Improves Physical Outcomes and Quality of Life In Patients With Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results from a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a non-invasive procedure that may be useful to treat symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Trials comparing ESWT with control groups have shown promising results. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus control in patients with symptomatic PAD. Data from eligible studies was analyzed using the Review Manager 5.4 software. Mean difference (MD) and 95% Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Inverse variance method and a random effects model were used for pooled estimates. A p-value < 0.05 (Z-test) was considered significant. Results: 5 randomized controlled trials with 264 patients were included in our analysis. A significant increase in the mean walking distance (MD: 54.13, 95% CI 9.34 to 98.92, p=0.02), pain-free walking distance (MD: 54.13, 95% CI 14.19, 57.88, p= 0.001), SF-36 physical component summary (MD: 11.97, 95% CI 0.26 to 23.69, p=0.05), EQ-5D-3L index score (MD; 0.08, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.15, p=0.05) and VascuQoL index ((MD: 0.48, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92, p= 0.04) was seen with ESWT. A slightly higher ankle brachial pressure index was seen in the control group (MD: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02 to -0.00, p=0.04). There was no difference in SF-36 physical functioning domain score (MD: 18.58, 95% CI: -0.29 to 37.45, p=0.05) and SF-36 bodily pain score (MD: 9.17, 95% CI: -2.885 to 21.19, p=0.13). Conclusions: There was significant improvement in walking distances, exertional symptoms, and quality of life with ESWT. However, ESWT did not translate to an increase in post-treatment ankle-brachial index which was slightly higher in the control group. There is a need for larger randomized controlled trials to substantiate the efficacy of ESWT in treating symptomatic PAD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143239
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Ozone Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143239: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Improves Physical Outcomes and Quality of Life In Patients With Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results from a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Alvi Fatima, Mujtaba Mubashir, Muhammad Ahmad Qureshi, Ummi Aiman Rahman et al.
Circulation
Medical and Biological Ozone Research
article

Abstract 4143239: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Improves Physical Outcomes and Quality of Life In Patients With Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: Results from a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Alvi Fatima, Mujtaba Mubashir, Muhammad Ahmad Qureshi, Ummi Aiman Rahman, Talha Kashif, Ali Akram Qureshi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a non-invasive procedure that may be useful to treat symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Trials comparing ESWT with control groups have shown promising results. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus control in patients with symptomatic PAD. Data from eligible studies was analyzed using the Review Manager 5.4 software. Mean difference (MD) and 95% Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Inverse variance method and a random effects model were used for pooled estimates. A p-value < 0.05 (Z-test) was considered significant. Results: 5 randomized controlled trials with 264 patients were included in our analysis. A significant increase in the mean walking distance (MD: 54.13, 95% CI 9.34 to 98.92, p=0.02), pain-free walking distance (MD: 54.13, 95% CI 14.19, 57.88, p= 0.001), SF-36 physical component summary (MD: 11.97, 95% CI 0.26 to 23.69, p=0.05), EQ-5D-3L index score (MD; 0.08, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.15, p=0.05) and VascuQoL index ((MD: 0.48, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92, p= 0.04) was seen with ESWT. A slightly higher ankle brachial pressure index was seen in the control group (MD: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02 to -0.00, p=0.04). There was no difference in SF-36 physical functioning domain score (MD: 18.58, 95% CI: -0.29 to 37.45, p=0.05) and SF-36 bodily pain score (MD: 9.17, 95% CI: -2.885 to 21.19, p=0.13). Conclusions: There was significant improvement in walking distances, exertional symptoms, and quality of life with ESWT. However, ESWT did not translate to an increase in post-treatment ankle-brachial index which was slightly higher in the control group. There is a need for larger randomized controlled trials to substantiate the efficacy of ESWT in treating symptomatic PAD.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
King Edward Medical University (PK), Fatima Jinnah Medical University (PK), Jackson Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Medical and Biological Ozone Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.