Violation of the handling rules of pathogens: discourse on the definition of the subject of the criminal offense

The relevance of the study is determined by the growing importance of ensuring the biological security of the state, in particular, by criminal legal means in the context of strengthening control over the activities of research, diagnostic and production microbiological laboratories that work with pathogenic material, as well as by the uncertainty of the criminal legal doctrine regarding the mandatory signs of the composition of the criminal offense under Art. 326 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The purpose of the article is to develop a scientifically grounded approach to the understanding of the subject of violation of the handling rules of microbiological objects that are pathogens of dangerous diseases, and the responsibility for which is provided for by Article 326 of the current Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as by Articles 5.1.12, 5.1.13 and 5.1.19 of the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine. To achieve this goal, the following scientific methods were used: hermeneutical, normative-dogmatic, formal-logical, system-structural. The provisions of international and national legislation of Ukraine, which determine the content of the subject of the relevant criminal offense, were analyzed. It was found out that, despite the dual interpretation, the term “biological agents is used both in the current and in the prospective legislative acts of Ukraine, and the lists of dangerous biological agents are approved by the Government and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. In the absence of the legal definition of the term “infectious agents” and the absence of any normative defined lists of such agents, the use of this term in the construction of the relevant criminal law norms is considered to be questionable. The meaning of the concept of “biotechnology products,” which was used by the authors of the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine to criminalize the violation of the handling rules of pathogens, has been determined. It was found out that there is no legally defined list of biotechnology products, which significantly expands the meaning of this concept. It was argued that the application of the definition of “biotechnology products” in a prospective codified criminal legal act will create unjustified competition of norms and will negatively affect the qualification of relevant criminal offenses. The optimal version of the disposition of the criminal legal norm on the violation of the mentioned rules of biological safety in terms of determining the subject of this criminal offense has been given.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visegrad Journal on Human Rights
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.4.15
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Violation of the handling rules of pathogens: discourse on the definition of the subject of the criminal offense

О. В. Шамсутдінов
Visegrad Journal on Human Rights
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Violation of the handling rules of pathogens: discourse on the definition of the subject of the criminal offense

О. В. Шамсутдінов
article en

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the growing importance of ensuring the biological security of the state, in particular, by criminal legal means in the context of strengthening control over the activities of research, diagnostic and production microbiological laboratories that work with pathogenic material, as well as by the uncertainty of the criminal legal doctrine regarding the mandatory signs of the composition of the criminal offense under Art. 326 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The purpose of the article is to develop a scientifically grounded approach to the understanding of the subject of violation of the handling rules of microbiological objects that are pathogens of dangerous diseases, and the responsibility for which is provided for by Article 326 of the current Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as by Articles 5.1.12, 5.1.13 and 5.1.19 of the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine. To achieve this goal, the following scientific methods were used: hermeneutical, normative-dogmatic, formal-logical, system-structural. The provisions of international and national legislation of Ukraine, which determine the content of the subject of the relevant criminal offense, were analyzed. It was found out that, despite the dual interpretation, the term “biological agents is used both in the current and in the prospective legislative acts of Ukraine, and the lists of dangerous biological agents are approved by the Government and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. In the absence of the legal definition of the term “infectious agents” and the absence of any normative defined lists of such agents, the use of this term in the construction of the relevant criminal law norms is considered to be questionable. The meaning of the concept of “biotechnology products,” which was used by the authors of the draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine to criminalize the violation of the handling rules of pathogens, has been determined. It was found out that there is no legally defined list of biotechnology products, which significantly expands the meaning of this concept. It was argued that the application of the definition of “biotechnology products” in a prospective codified criminal legal act will create unjustified competition of norms and will negatively affect the qualification of relevant criminal offenses. The optimal version of the disposition of the criminal legal norm on the violation of the mentioned rules of biological safety in terms of determining the subject of this criminal offense has been given.

Visegrad Journal on Human Rights(4)
National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.