Aspirational goals for the future of functional traits in restoration: a response to Gornish et al. (2023)

Quantitative functional traits, as presented in the ecology literature, can add great utility to the restoration toolbox. Yet, we see significant barriers to the realization of this utility in restoration practice. By addressing these barriers through co‐producing research, developing tools, and modifying policy, the field of restoration ecology can greatly increase the utility of traits. Gornish et al. (2023) argue that functional traits are already widely used in restoration projects and challenge the logistical feasibility of some of our proposed solutions to promote the use of traits in restoration. Here we continue the conversation and expand on our vision for the future of functional traits in restoration. We contend that we should not be content with the current state of the field and show how focus, inclusion, and ambition can drive advancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14336
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aspirational goals for the future of functional traits in restoration: a response to Gornish et al. (2023)

Thomas K. Merchant, Isabel de Silva, Jonathan J. Henn, Elisa Van Cleemput et al.
2 citations
Restoration Ecology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
article

Aspirational goals for the future of functional traits in restoration: a response to Gornish et al. (2023)

Thomas K. Merchant, Isabel de Silva, Jonathan J. Henn, Elisa Van Cleemput, Katharine N. Suding
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Quantitative functional traits, as presented in the ecology literature, can add great utility to the restoration toolbox. Yet, we see significant barriers to the realization of this utility in restoration practice. By addressing these barriers through co‐producing research, developing tools, and modifying policy, the field of restoration ecology can greatly increase the utility of traits. Gornish et al. (2023) argue that functional traits are already widely used in restoration projects and challenge the logistical feasibility of some of our proposed solutions to promote the use of traits in restoration. Here we continue the conversation and expand on our vision for the future of functional traits in restoration. We contend that we should not be content with the current state of the field and show how focus, inclusion, and ambition can drive advancement.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(3)
University of California, Riverside (US), Leiden University (NL), Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aspirational goals for the future of functional traits in restoration: a response to Gornish et al. (2023) — Thomas K. Merchant, Isabel de Silva, et al. · Restoration Ecology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS