Artificial intelligence wrote a fairy tale: simulation of text impact against the background of natural word-containing semiosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) is developed and improved as a “"language model”" of natural intelligence (NI). A superficial understanding of the relationship between text and meaning-making may be misleading regarding the capabilities and actions of AI. In this article, the AI phenomenon is presented within the framework of a communicative rather than a linguistic paradigm. The theoretical basis of the communicative approach can be considered the concepts of semiotic impact and the cognitive state of a semiotic actor, which are the cause of the generation of signs and meaning-making in natural semiosis (including word-containing, grapheme-containing, or textual). Postulating a system of semantic-formal modules “"sign body-meaning”" in the linguistic paradigm provokes an incorrect interpretation of the AI phenomenon, as a result of which the sign sequence (text) itself, corresponding to autonomous linguistic rules, becomes a sign of thinking (intelligence). The linguistic interpretation of AI is a problem (misunderstanding of the causes and consequences of AI “speaking”), which is removed by using a communicative approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
St Tikhons University Review Series III Philology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15382/sturiii202480.23-33
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence wrote a fairy tale: simulation of text impact against the background of natural word-containing semiosis

Andrey Vdovichenko
St Tikhons University Review Series III Philology
Language and cultural evolution
article

Artificial intelligence wrote a fairy tale: simulation of text impact against the background of natural word-containing semiosis

Andrey Vdovichenko
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is developed and improved as a “"language model”" of natural intelligence (NI). A superficial understanding of the relationship between text and meaning-making may be misleading regarding the capabilities and actions of AI. In this article, the AI phenomenon is presented within the framework of a communicative rather than a linguistic paradigm. The theoretical basis of the communicative approach can be considered the concepts of semiotic impact and the cognitive state of a semiotic actor, which are the cause of the generation of signs and meaning-making in natural semiosis (including word-containing, grapheme-containing, or textual). Postulating a system of semantic-formal modules “"sign body-meaning”" in the linguistic paradigm provokes an incorrect interpretation of the AI phenomenon, as a result of which the sign sequence (text) itself, corresponding to autonomous linguistic rules, becomes a sign of thinking (intelligence). The linguistic interpretation of AI is a problem (misunderstanding of the causes and consequences of AI “speaking”), which is removed by using a communicative approach.

St Tikhons University Review Series III PhilologyVol. 80
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Language and cultural evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial intelligence wrote a fairy tale: simulation of text impact against the background of natural word-containing semiosis — Andrey Vdovichenko · St Tikhons University Review Series III Philology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS