Comparative analysis of fitness coach training systems

The purpose of this study was to identify and study the most effective practices used in coach training systems in various countries of the world. The following methods of scientific cognition were used: comparative analysis, systematic method, and classification. As a result of the conducted research, an in-depth analysis of fitness coach training systems in the United States of America, Norway, Spain, and Kazakhstan was carried out. It was determined that in the American fitness coach training system, a distinctive feature is a high diversity of educational programmes, which is supported by the standardisation of qualifications. In the context of the Norwegian training system, an emphasis was placed on maintaining and developing the principles of health and activity, and on the professional ethics of specialists, including psychological training and interaction with clients. Consideration of the Spanish approach demonstrated the importance of aesthetics and diversity of physical activity for local educational programmes. The specific features of training fitness coaches in Spain also include issues of motivation and psychological training of future specialists. In Kazakhstan, a combination of conventional and innovative methods in the training of fitness coaches has been revealed, which consists in studying the pedagogical approach and introducing the latest trends in fitness. A detailed examination of the above systems helped to identify key differences in approaches to ethics and responsibility of coaches. Based on the analysis, a universal approach to training fitness coaches based on best practices was developed and described.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.109388
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of fitness coach training systems

Vitaliy Avsiyevich, Zhanna Sabyrbek, Ilya Krugovykh, Toktassyn Bekbolatov et al.
Retos
Physical Education and Training Studies
article

Comparative analysis of fitness coach training systems

Vitaliy Avsiyevich, Zhanna Sabyrbek, Ilya Krugovykh, Toktassyn Bekbolatov, Sharkul Taubayeva
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and study the most effective practices used in coach training systems in various countries of the world. The following methods of scientific cognition were used: comparative analysis, systematic method, and classification. As a result of the conducted research, an in-depth analysis of fitness coach training systems in the United States of America, Norway, Spain, and Kazakhstan was carried out. It was determined that in the American fitness coach training system, a distinctive feature is a high diversity of educational programmes, which is supported by the standardisation of qualifications. In the context of the Norwegian training system, an emphasis was placed on maintaining and developing the principles of health and activity, and on the professional ethics of specialists, including psychological training and interaction with clients. Consideration of the Spanish approach demonstrated the importance of aesthetics and diversity of physical activity for local educational programmes. The specific features of training fitness coaches in Spain also include issues of motivation and psychological training of future specialists. In Kazakhstan, a combination of conventional and innovative methods in the training of fitness coaches has been revealed, which consists in studying the pedagogical approach and introducing the latest trends in fitness. A detailed examination of the above systems helped to identify key differences in approaches to ethics and responsibility of coaches. Based on the analysis, a universal approach to training fitness coaches based on best practices was developed and described.

RetosVol. 62
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Physical Education and Training Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.