Matching excellence: Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ rise to parity with Pacific Biosciences in genome reconstruction of non-model bacterium with high G+C content

The reconstruction of complete bacterial genomes is essential for microbial research, offering insights into genetic content, ontology and regulation. While Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) provides high-quality genomes, its cost remains a limitation. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers long reads at a lower cost, yet its error rate raises scepticism. Recent ONT advancements, such as new Flow cells (R10.4.1), chemistry (V14) and duplex mode, improve data quality. Our study compares ONT with PacBio and Illumina, including hybrid data. We used <i>Propionibacterium freudenreichii</i>, a bacterium with a genome known for being difficult to reconstruct. By combining data from ONT's Native Barcoding and a custom-developed BARSEQ method, we achieved high-quality, near-perfect genome assemblies. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time, that the combination of nanopore-only long-native with shorter PCR DNA reads (~3 kb) results in high-quality genome reconstruction, comparable to hybrid data assembly from two sequencing platforms. This endorses ONT as a cost-effective, stand-alone strategy for bacterial genome reconstruction. Additionally, we compared methylated motif detection between PacBio and ONT R10.4.1 data, showing that results comparable to PacBio are achievable using ONT, especially when utilizing the advanced Nanomotif tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbial Genomics
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001316
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matching excellence: Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ rise to parity with Pacific Biosciences in genome reconstruction of non-model bacterium with high G+C content

Farhad M. Panah, Paulina Deptula, Łukasz Krych, Wenwen Li et al.
9 citations
Microbial Genomics
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
2.10
article

Matching excellence: Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ rise to parity with Pacific Biosciences in genome reconstruction of non-model bacterium with high G+C content

Farhad M. Panah, Paulina Deptula, Łukasz Krych, Wenwen Li, Alexey Fomenkov, Richard J. Roberts, Pablo Atienza, Hui Yan, Axel Soto‐Serrano
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The reconstruction of complete bacterial genomes is essential for microbial research, offering insights into genetic content, ontology and regulation. While Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) provides high-quality genomes, its cost remains a limitation. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers long reads at a lower cost, yet its error rate raises scepticism. Recent ONT advancements, such as new Flow cells (R10.4.1), chemistry (V14) and duplex mode, improve data quality. Our study compares ONT with PacBio and Illumina, including hybrid data. We used <i>Propionibacterium freudenreichii</i>, a bacterium with a genome known for being difficult to reconstruct. By combining data from ONT's Native Barcoding and a custom-developed BARSEQ method, we achieved high-quality, near-perfect genome assemblies. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time, that the combination of nanopore-only long-native with shorter PCR DNA reads (~3 kb) results in high-quality genome reconstruction, comparable to hybrid data assembly from two sequencing platforms. This endorses ONT as a cost-effective, stand-alone strategy for bacterial genome reconstruction. Additionally, we compared methylated motif detection between PacBio and ONT R10.4.1 data, showing that results comparable to PacBio are achievable using ONT, especially when utilizing the advanced Nanomotif tool.

Microbial GenomicsVol. 10(11)
New England Biolabs (United States) (US), University of Copenhagen (DK)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.