Influence of Socioeconomic Factors and Nutritional Advice on Diet Quality in Women of Reproductive Age: A FIGO-DQS Assessment

Better food choices (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.16-2.51), higher knowledge level (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.119-2.466), and healthcare advice (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.119-2.466) increased the chances of having a better diet. Both healthcare providers (β = 0.503, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and determinants of food choices (β = 0.520, <i>p</i> = 0.011) had a significant influence on the FIGO score, although the advice provided by the healthcare professionals did not yield a significant influence on the determinants of food choices (β = 0.310, <i>p</i> = 0.125); Conclusions: Knowledge had a mediator effect on the impact of healthcare guidance on nutrition practices, but it does not fully explain the adherence to healthy lifestyle choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16223855
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Socioeconomic Factors and Nutritional Advice on Diet Quality in Women of Reproductive Age: A FIGO-DQS Assessment

Lidia Iuliana Arhire, Andreea Gherasim, Cornelia Mircea, Otilia Niță et al.
1 citations
Nutrients
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
0.85
article

Influence of Socioeconomic Factors and Nutritional Advice on Diet Quality in Women of Reproductive Age: A FIGO-DQS Assessment

Lidia Iuliana Arhire, Andreea Gherasim, Cornelia Mircea, Otilia Niță, Laura Mihalache, Alina Delia Popa, Oana Cioancă, Andreea-Maria Mitran, Graur Mariana, Nikolic Mihaela
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Better food choices (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.16-2.51), higher knowledge level (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.119-2.466), and healthcare advice (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.119-2.466) increased the chances of having a better diet. Both healthcare providers (β = 0.503, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and determinants of food choices (β = 0.520, <i>p</i> = 0.011) had a significant influence on the FIGO score, although the advice provided by the healthcare professionals did not yield a significant influence on the determinants of food choices (β = 0.310, <i>p</i> = 0.125); Conclusions: Knowledge had a mediator effect on the impact of healthcare guidance on nutrition practices, but it does not fully explain the adherence to healthy lifestyle choices.

NutrientsVol. 16(22)
Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iasi University of Life Sciences (RO)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.