Sharing a Team’s Vision: Discretionary Behavioral Expectations, Trust, and Team Autonomy, oh my!

Despite knowing that a shared vision can result in a number of positive outcomes for groups and teams, we have a very limited understanding of what potentially contributes to group and team members sharing the same vision. This study seeks to contribute to our very limited understanding of what potentially contributes to team members sharing their team’s vision by focusing on team members’ expectations of their teammates engaging in discretionary behaviors directed toward the organization, the degree to which team members trust their teammates, and the degree to which team managers provide their teams autonomy. Using 197 team members across 46 teams/team managers and 13 organizations, I find that team members’ expectations of their teammates engaging in citizenship behaviors directed toward the organization is positively associated with team members sharing their team’s vision, but I find no association for team members’ expectations of their teammates engaging in deviant behaviors directed toward the organization and sharing their team’s vision. However, I find that trust weakens and team autonomy strengthens the negative relationship between team members’ expectations of their teammates’ deviant behaviors directed toward the organization and sharing their team’s vision. I find no conditional effects of trust and team autonomy on the relationship between OCBO expectations and shared vision. These results suggest that both properties of individual team members as well as the team may play an important role in sharing a team’s vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241297212
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sharing a Team’s Vision: Discretionary Behavioral Expectations, Trust, and Team Autonomy, oh my!

Kevin S. Cruz
Group & Organization Management
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Sharing a Team’s Vision: Discretionary Behavioral Expectations, Trust, and Team Autonomy, oh my!

Kevin S. Cruz
article en

Abstract

Despite knowing that a shared vision can result in a number of positive outcomes for groups and teams, we have a very limited understanding of what potentially contributes to group and team members sharing the same vision. This study seeks to contribute to our very limited understanding of what potentially contributes to team members sharing their team’s vision by focusing on team members’ expectations of their teammates engaging in discretionary behaviors directed toward the organization, the degree to which team members trust their teammates, and the degree to which team managers provide their teams autonomy. Using 197 team members across 46 teams/team managers and 13 organizations, I find that team members’ expectations of their teammates engaging in citizenship behaviors directed toward the organization is positively associated with team members sharing their team’s vision, but I find no association for team members’ expectations of their teammates engaging in deviant behaviors directed toward the organization and sharing their team’s vision. However, I find that trust weakens and team autonomy strengthens the negative relationship between team members’ expectations of their teammates’ deviant behaviors directed toward the organization and sharing their team’s vision. I find no conditional effects of trust and team autonomy on the relationship between OCBO expectations and shared vision. These results suggest that both properties of individual team members as well as the team may play an important role in sharing a team’s vision.

Group & Organization Management
Georgia Southern University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.