Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs

The transition to online examinations and assignments raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Traditional plagiarism detection systems often struggle to identify instances of intelligent cheating, particularly when students utilize advanced generative AI tools to craft their responses. This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing within academic contexts. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks, both with and without the assistance of generative AI. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios. The findings highlight significant differences in keystroke dynamics between genuine and assisted writing. The outcomes of this study enhance our understanding of how users interact with generative AI and have implications for improving the reliability of digital educational platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcb62174.2024.10744461
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs

Avinash Anand, Naman Lal, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Rajesh Kumar et al.
8 citations
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.21
article

Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs

Avinash Anand, Naman Lal, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Rajesh Kumar, Apoorv Singh, Debnath Kundu, Atharva Mehta
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The transition to online examinations and assignments raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Traditional plagiarism detection systems often struggle to identify instances of intelligent cheating, particularly when students utilize advanced generative AI tools to craft their responses. This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing within academic contexts. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks, both with and without the assistance of generative AI. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios. The findings highlight significant differences in keystroke dynamics between genuine and assisted writing. The outcomes of this study enhance our understanding of how users interact with generative AI and have implications for improving the reliability of digital educational platforms.

Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN), Midas Multispeciality Hospital (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.