Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop

We explore the interplay between automation and human involvement in data science. Emerging from in-depth discussions at a Dagstuhl seminar, we synthesize perspectives from Automated Data Science (AutoDS) and Interactive Data Visualization (VIS) – two fields that traditionally represent opposing ends of the human-machine spectrum. While AutoDS seeks to enhance efficiency through increasing automation, VIS underscores the critical value of human involvement in providing nuanced understanding, creativity, innovation, and contextual relevance. We explore these dichotomies through an online survey and advocate for a balanced approach that harmonizes the speed and consistency of effective automation with the indispensable insights of human expertise and thought. Ultimately, we confront the essential question: what aspects of data science should we automate?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vds63897.2024.00005
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop

Andreas Kerren, Emily Wall, Jen Rogers, Mehdi Chakhchoukh et al.
4 citations
Data Visualization and Analytics
1.00
article

Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop

Andreas Kerren, Emily Wall, Jen Rogers, Mehdi Chakhchoukh, Steffen Koch, Lars Kotthoff, Rebecca Faust, Çağatay Turkay, Jürgen Bernard, Marie Anastacio
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We explore the interplay between automation and human involvement in data science. Emerging from in-depth discussions at a Dagstuhl seminar, we synthesize perspectives from Automated Data Science (AutoDS) and Interactive Data Visualization (VIS) – two fields that traditionally represent opposing ends of the human-machine spectrum. While AutoDS seeks to enhance efficiency through increasing automation, VIS underscores the critical value of human involvement in providing nuanced understanding, creativity, innovation, and contextual relevance. We explore these dichotomies through an online survey and advocate for a balanced approach that harmonizes the speed and consistency of effective automation with the indispensable insights of human expertise and thought. Ultimately, we confront the essential question: what aspects of data science should we automate?

University of Stuttgart (DE), Tulane University (US), Tufts University (US), University of Wyoming (US), Emory University (US), University of Zurich (CH), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Warwick (GB), Wyoming Department of Education (US), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Data Visualization and Analytics
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.