Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop
We explore the interplay between automation and human involvement in data science. Emerging from in-depth discussions at a Dagstuhl seminar, we synthesize perspectives from Automated Data Science (AutoDS) and Interactive Data Visualization (VIS) – two fields that traditionally represent opposing ends of the human-machine spectrum. While AutoDS seeks to enhance efficiency through increasing automation, VIS underscores the critical value of human involvement in providing nuanced understanding, creativity, innovation, and contextual relevance. We explore these dichotomies through an online survey and advocate for a balanced approach that harmonizes the speed and consistency of effective automation with the indispensable insights of human expertise and thought. Ultimately, we confront the essential question: what aspects of data science should we automate?
Authors
- Andreas Kerren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-2537)
- Emily Wall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-0698)
- Jen Rogers
- Mehdi Chakhchoukh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-0488)
- Steffen Koch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9360-799X)
- Lars Kotthoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4635-6873)
- Rebecca Faust (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-1287)
- Çağatay Turkay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-251X)
- Jürgen Bernard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-9709)
- Marie Anastacio
Institutions
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Tulane University (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Wyoming Department of Education (US)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/vds63897.2024.00005
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Data Visualization and Analytics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.00