Teaching deep networks to see shape: Lessons from a simplified visual world

Deep neural networks have been remarkably successful as models of the primate visual system. One crucial problem is that they fail to account for the strong shape-dependence of primate vision. Whereas humans base their judgements of category membership to a large extent on shape, deep networks rely much more strongly on other features such as color and texture. While this problem has been widely documented, the underlying reasons remain unclear. We design simple, artificial image datasets in which shape, color, and texture features can be used to predict the image class. By training networks from scratch to classify images with single features and feature combinations, we show that some network architectures are unable to learn to use shape features, whereas others are able to use shape in principle but are biased towards the other features. We show that the bias can be explained by the interactions between the weight updates for many images in mini-batch gradient descent. This suggests that different learning algorithms with sparser, more local weight changes are required to make networks more sensitive to shape and improve their capability to describe human vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012019
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching deep networks to see shape: Lessons from a simplified visual world

Christian Jarvers, Heiko Neumann
2 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
0.50
article

Teaching deep networks to see shape: Lessons from a simplified visual world

Christian Jarvers, Heiko Neumann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Deep neural networks have been remarkably successful as models of the primate visual system. One crucial problem is that they fail to account for the strong shape-dependence of primate vision. Whereas humans base their judgements of category membership to a large extent on shape, deep networks rely much more strongly on other features such as color and texture. While this problem has been widely documented, the underlying reasons remain unclear. We design simple, artificial image datasets in which shape, color, and texture features can be used to predict the image class. By training networks from scratch to classify images with single features and feature combinations, we show that some network architectures are unable to learn to use shape features, whereas others are able to use shape in principle but are biased towards the other features. We show that the bias can be explained by the interactions between the weight updates for many images in mini-batch gradient descent. This suggests that different learning algorithms with sparser, more local weight changes are required to make networks more sensitive to shape and improve their capability to describe human vision.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 20(11)
Universität Ulm (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teaching deep networks to see shape: Lessons from a simplified visual world — Christian Jarvers, Heiko Neumann · PLoS Computational Biology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS