Key Metrics and Experimental Test Bench for Assessing Highly Sensitive Magnetometers in Research

Ultralow magnetic field sensing is rapidly emerging as a technology in various applications, providing a noninvasive and instantaneous method of data acquisition (DAQ). The increasing availability of improved or innovative types of magnetometers promotes the need for a benchmark metric. This contribution focuses on the evaluation of single magnetometer devices that detect magnetic fields in the femtotesla range and are usually used in a magnetically shielded environment. For assessment, a device alignment actuator system is presented that enables an accurate 3-D alignment of the device under test (DuT) around a single point within a known, homogeneous magnetic test field inside the highly magnetically shielded room (MSR), called BMSR-2.1 at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany. The defined benchmark metric includes several key parameters, such as frequency response, amplitude stability, frequency stability, and directivity, to name just a few. These parameters are introduced by using different commercial state-of-the-art spin exchange relaxation-free optically pumped magnetometers (SERF-OPMs) and compared to the reference system based on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), which remain the gold standard in magnetometry. This approach ensures consistent evaluation across different magnetometer types, provided that they operate at room temperature and fit within the evaluation platform. The platform can also be adapted for multichannel magnetometer systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2024.3491164
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key Metrics and Experimental Test Bench for Assessing Highly Sensitive Magnetometers in Research

Stephen E. Robinson, W. D. Evans, Michael Höft, Surjo R. Soekadar et al.
13 citations
IEEE Sensors Journal
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
2.71
article

Key Metrics and Experimental Test Bench for Assessing Highly Sensitive Magnetometers in Research

Stephen E. Robinson, W. D. Evans, Michael Höft, Surjo R. Soekadar, Eric Elzenheimer, S. Knappe-Grüneberg, Jan Zerfowski, Jens-Uwe Voigt, Fabian Grüneberg
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Ultralow magnetic field sensing is rapidly emerging as a technology in various applications, providing a noninvasive and instantaneous method of data acquisition (DAQ). The increasing availability of improved or innovative types of magnetometers promotes the need for a benchmark metric. This contribution focuses on the evaluation of single magnetometer devices that detect magnetic fields in the femtotesla range and are usually used in a magnetically shielded environment. For assessment, a device alignment actuator system is presented that enables an accurate 3-D alignment of the device under test (DuT) around a single point within a known, homogeneous magnetic test field inside the highly magnetically shielded room (MSR), called BMSR-2.1 at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany. The defined benchmark metric includes several key parameters, such as frequency response, amplitude stability, frequency stability, and directivity, to name just a few. These parameters are introduced by using different commercial state-of-the-art spin exchange relaxation-free optically pumped magnetometers (SERF-OPMs) and compared to the reference system based on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), which remain the gold standard in magnetometry. This approach ensures consistent evaluation across different magnetometer types, provided that they operate at room temperature and fit within the evaluation platform. The platform can also be adapted for multichannel magnetometer systems.

IEEE Sensors JournalVol. 25(2)
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), National Institutes of Health (US), X-Fab (Germany) (DE), Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), National Institute of Mental Health (US), National Institute of Mental Health (CZ), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.