CTNI-41. LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AND PATTERNS OF PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH OR WITHOUT TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) is an FDA-approved locoregional treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). Previous trial data showed the addition of TTFields to standard TMZ-based therapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS), but real-world data is lacking, particularly with long follow-up duration. Here, we report real-world survival and patterns of progression for patients with ndGBM treated with or without TTFields. METHODS Patients diagnosed with GBM and treated with standard of care therapy at the Medical College of Wisconsin between March 2015–March 2023 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS outcomes were assessed, and compared across groups who received or did not receive TTFields therapy during maintenance treatment. Patterns of disease progression were analyzed via anatomic assessment. Patients were followed through March 1, 2024. RESULTS A total of 210 patients (TTFields: n=110/52.4%; No-TTFields: n=100/47.6%) were included for analysis. Median age was 60 and 63 years for the TTFields and No-TTFields groups, respectively, with each group 43% female. Other baseline characteristics were consistent across groups. Median TTFields duration was 6.8 months (range: 1–94). OS was significantly improved for the TTFields group vs No-TTFields group (median OS: 21.6 months [18.4–24.8] vs 17.7 months [15.0–20.8]; HR 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54–0.99, P=0.042]). Median PFS was 12.1 months (10.3–14.4) vs 9.6 months (8.5–12.8) with HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.58–1.02; P=0.071). 5-year OS was 17% (10–28) for the TTFields group, and 11% (5–22) for No-TTFields group. Patients treated with TTFields exhibited a higher rate of non-local progression compared with the No-TTFields group (28% vs 15%, [P=0.044]). CONCLUSIONS Analysis of patients from a large institutional dataset reveals an association between TTFields use and long-term survival benefit. Higher incidence of non-local patterns of progression among TTFields users is consistent with pivotal trial findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0408
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-41. LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AND PATTERNS OF PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH OR WITHOUT TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING

Devon C. Riegel, Patrick R. Conlon, Britta L Bureau, Jennifer Connelly et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

CTNI-41. LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AND PATTERNS OF PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH OR WITHOUT TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING

Devon C. Riegel, Patrick R. Conlon, Britta L Bureau, Jennifer Connelly, Gordon Chavez
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) is an FDA-approved locoregional treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). Previous trial data showed the addition of TTFields to standard TMZ-based therapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS), but real-world data is lacking, particularly with long follow-up duration. Here, we report real-world survival and patterns of progression for patients with ndGBM treated with or without TTFields. METHODS Patients diagnosed with GBM and treated with standard of care therapy at the Medical College of Wisconsin between March 2015–March 2023 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS outcomes were assessed, and compared across groups who received or did not receive TTFields therapy during maintenance treatment. Patterns of disease progression were analyzed via anatomic assessment. Patients were followed through March 1, 2024. RESULTS A total of 210 patients (TTFields: n=110/52.4%; No-TTFields: n=100/47.6%) were included for analysis. Median age was 60 and 63 years for the TTFields and No-TTFields groups, respectively, with each group 43% female. Other baseline characteristics were consistent across groups. Median TTFields duration was 6.8 months (range: 1–94). OS was significantly improved for the TTFields group vs No-TTFields group (median OS: 21.6 months [18.4–24.8] vs 17.7 months [15.0–20.8]; HR 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54–0.99, P=0.042]). Median PFS was 12.1 months (10.3–14.4) vs 9.6 months (8.5–12.8) with HR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.58–1.02; P=0.071). 5-year OS was 17% (10–28) for the TTFields group, and 11% (5–22) for No-TTFields group. Patients treated with TTFields exhibited a higher rate of non-local progression compared with the No-TTFields group (28% vs 15%, [P=0.044]). CONCLUSIONS Analysis of patients from a large institutional dataset reveals an association between TTFields use and long-term survival benefit. Higher incidence of non-local patterns of progression among TTFields users is consistent with pivotal trial findings.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Novocure (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.