QOL-11. GBM PATIENTS CONTINUE TO FACE BARRIERS TO PERSONALIZED AND COMPREHENSIVE CARE THAT MAY IMPACT LONGEVITY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE

Abstract We assessed the quality and accessibility of healthcare services provided to Glioblastoma (GBM) patients across the United States through an online survey distributed among the OurBrainBank community and partners and promoted on social media. A total of 297 patients or caregivers completed the survey (85% caregivers; 15% GBM patients). Median age at diagnosis was 57, lower than the national average of 64. 78% of our respondents described having some college education, and 69% had commercial insurance. Preliminary results revealed that 69% were informed about tumor testing. Among those informed, 64% did not have any molecular testing beyond initial diagnostic tests. For all respondents, 65% were not informed about storing tissue for future testing, and 79% reported not having their tissue stored for possible treatments or clinical trial qualification. Additionally, 52% reported no discussion of seeking a second opinion, and 64% reported not being offered enrollment in any clinical trial. Overall, people living with GBM face significant barriers to achieving comprehensive and personalized care. Lack of tumor testing and storage present missed opportunities for future access to emerging therapies that could improve individual outcomes. Over half of patients had no discussion about seeking a second opinion and were not offered enrollment in clinical trials, highlighting significant barriers to accessing life-extending or quality-of-life (QOL) improving treatments. Compared to the general population affected by GBM, survey respondents represented a disproportionately young and urban population, suggesting potential bias in who is able to respond to the survey. This may underestimate the challenges faced by patients with additional barriers. We are implementing strategies to reach a more geographically diverse participant group, particularly in rural areas. Ongoing targeted recruitment will further elucidate barriers to patient-centered care in GBM, with the potential for significant improvements in survival and QOL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1046
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QOL-11. GBM PATIENTS CONTINUE TO FACE BARRIERS TO PERSONALIZED AND COMPREHENSIVE CARE THAT MAY IMPACT LONGEVITY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE

Lakshmi Nayak, David Robles, Jacob Ellen, Kelli Duprey et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

QOL-11. GBM PATIENTS CONTINUE TO FACE BARRIERS TO PERSONALIZED AND COMPREHENSIVE CARE THAT MAY IMPACT LONGEVITY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE

Lakshmi Nayak, David Robles, Jacob Ellen, Kelli Duprey, Ed Pilkington, FABIO MASSAITI IWAMOTO, Quinn T Ostrum
article en

Abstract

Abstract We assessed the quality and accessibility of healthcare services provided to Glioblastoma (GBM) patients across the United States through an online survey distributed among the OurBrainBank community and partners and promoted on social media. A total of 297 patients or caregivers completed the survey (85% caregivers; 15% GBM patients). Median age at diagnosis was 57, lower than the national average of 64. 78% of our respondents described having some college education, and 69% had commercial insurance. Preliminary results revealed that 69% were informed about tumor testing. Among those informed, 64% did not have any molecular testing beyond initial diagnostic tests. For all respondents, 65% were not informed about storing tissue for future testing, and 79% reported not having their tissue stored for possible treatments or clinical trial qualification. Additionally, 52% reported no discussion of seeking a second opinion, and 64% reported not being offered enrollment in any clinical trial. Overall, people living with GBM face significant barriers to achieving comprehensive and personalized care. Lack of tumor testing and storage present missed opportunities for future access to emerging therapies that could improve individual outcomes. Over half of patients had no discussion about seeking a second opinion and were not offered enrollment in clinical trials, highlighting significant barriers to accessing life-extending or quality-of-life (QOL) improving treatments. Compared to the general population affected by GBM, survey respondents represented a disproportionately young and urban population, suggesting potential bias in who is able to respond to the survey. This may underestimate the challenges faced by patients with additional barriers. We are implementing strategies to reach a more geographically diverse participant group, particularly in rural areas. Ongoing targeted recruitment will further elucidate barriers to patient-centered care in GBM, with the potential for significant improvements in survival and QOL.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Harvard University (US), Duke University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.