CTNI-77. PHASE 1 DOSE FINDING STUDY EVALUATING THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND EFFICACY OF IOPOFOSINE I 131 IN CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS, AND YOUNG ADULTS WITH INOPERABLE RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS: A TRIAL-IN-PROGRESS
Abstract Iopofosine I 131, a radioconjugate therapy targeting tumor lipid rafts, is being assessed in CLOVER-2 [NCT05610891]–an ongoing dose-finding study evaluating iopofosine in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed, refractory, recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and ependymoma. Major inclusion criteria include patients aged 10-25 years, previously confirmed HGGs or ependymoma, ≥1 measurable intracranial lesion (≥10 mm in longest diameter), and performance status ≥60. Patients are assigned 1:1 to 2 treatment arms which will be assessed in parallel. Arm 1 has 2 cycles, each composed of 2 doses of 20 mCi/m2 given 14 days apart (± 1 day). Cycle 2 is given 8 weeks (± 4 days) post-initial infusion. Arm 2 patients receive 3 cycles of 10 mCi/m2 per dose. Patients in either arm are eligible for 1 additional cycle at the physician’s discretion. If after the first 10 patients, Arm 1 is not tolerated, dosing is reduced to 15 mCi/m2 per infusion. If after the first 10 patients in Arm 2 are deemed to be ineffective and Arm 1 is deemed to be tolerated, dosing is increased to 15 mCi/m2 per infusion. Final visits occur 57 days following the last cycle initiation, with quarterly follow-ups in year 1 and annually in years 2 and 3. Primary endpoints include safety, tolerability, and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are dosimetry, recommended phase 2 dosing determination, overall survival, antitumor and therapeutic activity, and duration of response and clinical benefit. Safety analysis uses the Wilson score method and nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Efficacy analyses use the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology criteria and the Kaplan-Meier method to detect a median PFS of 5 months compared to a historical control of 2 months. For 90% power by a 1-sided, 1-sample log-rank test: ≥10 evaluable patients must be enrolled (≤90) across ≤15 sites.
Authors
- Jarrod Longcor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-4692)
- Neeta D. Pandit-Taskar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-2036)
- Daniel A. Morgenstern (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-1108)
- Anirban Das (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-9529)
- Sameer Farouk Sait (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6715-2402)
- Pat Zanzonico (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7334-2752)
- Andrei R. Shustov
- Sofia Haque (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-9997)
- Julia Glade Bender (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5316-6440)
- C. Miller Fisher
- Miriam Pudel
Institutions
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- SickKids Foundation (CA)
- Cellectar Biosciences (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0444
- Primary Topic
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00