EPID-29. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BRAIN METASTASES IN MELANOMA: A LARGE POPULATION BASED-STUDY FROM 2014-2024

Abstract Brain metastases (BM) are the second most common cause of mortality in metastatic melanoma. Despite increased screening, mortality remains substantial. Additionally, population-based studies of melanoma BM capture only synchronous metastases, therefore up-to-date epidemiological and survival studies may better inform screening and management strategies. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed the TrinetX Oncology dataset to study the prevalence and survival patterns of patients with melanoma BM. Data from 13,505 patients with histologically-confirmed melanoma was extracted. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between patients with and without BM via t-test and chi-squared analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses after cohorts were propensity-matched for age, sex, race, ethnicity, stage, extracranial metastases, excision of skin lesions, radiation, and antineoplastic utilization. In our study, the prevalence of BM was 7.3% (9.2% precocious, 22.5% synchronous, 68.3% metachronous). Compared to patients without BM, patients who developed BM were more often male (p<0.0001), non-Hispanic (p<0.0001), White (p<0.02), and presented with advanced-stage disease (p<0.0001). Patients with unspecified malignant melanoma (p<0.0001) and nodular melanoma (p<0.0001) were more likely to develop BM compared to those with other histological subtypes. Additionally, patients with BM were more likely to have ulceration (p<0.0001) and extracranial metastases (p<0.0001). Skin excision procedures were less common in patients with BM (p<0.0001), whereas radiotherapy and antineoplastics were more common. When assessed from melanoma diagnosis, patients who developed BM any time along their disease course had reduced OS (HR(95% CI): 2.265(1.934-2.653)). When assessed from metastatic onset, patients with BM had reduced OS compared to those with only extracranial metastases (HR (95% CI): 2.197(1.883-2.563)). Synchronous BM were associated with decreased OS compared to metachronous BM when assessed from melanoma onset (HR(95% CI): 0.6(0.442-0.815)), but there was no survival difference after BM development. In conclusion, BMs decrease OS in melanoma. Our findings may inform screening and management of patients at risk for melanoma BM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0565
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EPID-29. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BRAIN METASTASES IN MELANOMA: A LARGE POPULATION BASED-STUDY FROM 2014-2024

David Kamson, Xiaobu Ye, Kristin J. Redmond, Kelly Jiang et al.
1 citations
Neuro-Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
0.42
article

EPID-29. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BRAIN METASTASES IN MELANOMA: A LARGE POPULATION BASED-STUDY FROM 2014-2024

David Kamson, Xiaobu Ye, Kristin J. Redmond, Kelly Jiang, Evan J. Lipson, Megan Parker, Joshua Materi, Govind Warrier, Anita Kalluri, Jordina Rincón-Torroella, Patrick Kramer, Chetan Bettegowda, Tej Azad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Brain metastases (BM) are the second most common cause of mortality in metastatic melanoma. Despite increased screening, mortality remains substantial. Additionally, population-based studies of melanoma BM capture only synchronous metastases, therefore up-to-date epidemiological and survival studies may better inform screening and management strategies. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed the TrinetX Oncology dataset to study the prevalence and survival patterns of patients with melanoma BM. Data from 13,505 patients with histologically-confirmed melanoma was extracted. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between patients with and without BM via t-test and chi-squared analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses after cohorts were propensity-matched for age, sex, race, ethnicity, stage, extracranial metastases, excision of skin lesions, radiation, and antineoplastic utilization. In our study, the prevalence of BM was 7.3% (9.2% precocious, 22.5% synchronous, 68.3% metachronous). Compared to patients without BM, patients who developed BM were more often male (p<0.0001), non-Hispanic (p<0.0001), White (p<0.02), and presented with advanced-stage disease (p<0.0001). Patients with unspecified malignant melanoma (p<0.0001) and nodular melanoma (p<0.0001) were more likely to develop BM compared to those with other histological subtypes. Additionally, patients with BM were more likely to have ulceration (p<0.0001) and extracranial metastases (p<0.0001). Skin excision procedures were less common in patients with BM (p<0.0001), whereas radiotherapy and antineoplastics were more common. When assessed from melanoma diagnosis, patients who developed BM any time along their disease course had reduced OS (HR(95% CI): 2.265(1.934-2.653)). When assessed from metastatic onset, patients with BM had reduced OS compared to those with only extracranial metastases (HR (95% CI): 2.197(1.883-2.563)). Synchronous BM were associated with decreased OS compared to metachronous BM when assessed from melanoma onset (HR(95% CI): 0.6(0.442-0.815)), but there was no survival difference after BM development. In conclusion, BMs decrease OS in melanoma. Our findings may inform screening and management of patients at risk for melanoma BM.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.