QLTI-15. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND GLIOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Medical malpractice affects the practice of medicine in every field and specialty. It is a particular concern in high risk specialties including neurological surgery, which has the greatest risk of malpractice litigation. Treatment of glioma patients is complex and requires diagnosis based on presentation and imaging, followed by the decision of resection versus biopsy to confirm diagnosis and potentially improve prognosis. The possibility of a complication accompanies every procedure and patients generally also go on to receive chemotherapy and radiation. Interdisciplinary care is a hallmark. We explored medical malpractice litigation pertaining to gliomas with a focus on outcomes and the role of the defendants as well as the liabilities prompting litigation. METHODS WestLaw Precision, an established legal database, was queried for all cases relevant to “glioma” occurring since 2000. Cases and settlements, in particular, were considered. Keywords included “glioma” and “medical malpractice” with the date range including all cases after January 1, 2000. Cases were identified and analyzed for variables of interest. RESULTS Fourteen relevant cases were identified and reviewed. There were three plaintiff verdicts, one settlement and ten defense verdicts in favor of the defense. Two cases involved minors, while all others concerned adults. Both cases pertaining to the care of minors with gliomas resulted in findings for the defense. The majority of cases centered on failure to diagnose occurring before surgery or treatment. Defendants included neurosurgeons, pathologists, radiologists, nurses and hospital systems. Although the number of cases considered here is small, jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs resulted in far higher payouts compared with settlements. CONCLUSIONS Medical malpractice allegations relating to glioma treatment are shown to be rare and infrequent. The majority of cases alleged a failure to appropriately diagnose, before surgery or treatment took place. The great majority of cases reported within WestLaw Precision resulted in jury verdicts for the defense.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1029
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QLTI-15. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND GLIOMA

Celina Crisman, Rose Fluss
Neuro-Oncology
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

QLTI-15. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND GLIOMA

Celina Crisman, Rose Fluss
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Medical malpractice affects the practice of medicine in every field and specialty. It is a particular concern in high risk specialties including neurological surgery, which has the greatest risk of malpractice litigation. Treatment of glioma patients is complex and requires diagnosis based on presentation and imaging, followed by the decision of resection versus biopsy to confirm diagnosis and potentially improve prognosis. The possibility of a complication accompanies every procedure and patients generally also go on to receive chemotherapy and radiation. Interdisciplinary care is a hallmark. We explored medical malpractice litigation pertaining to gliomas with a focus on outcomes and the role of the defendants as well as the liabilities prompting litigation. METHODS WestLaw Precision, an established legal database, was queried for all cases relevant to “glioma” occurring since 2000. Cases and settlements, in particular, were considered. Keywords included “glioma” and “medical malpractice” with the date range including all cases after January 1, 2000. Cases were identified and analyzed for variables of interest. RESULTS Fourteen relevant cases were identified and reviewed. There were three plaintiff verdicts, one settlement and ten defense verdicts in favor of the defense. Two cases involved minors, while all others concerned adults. Both cases pertaining to the care of minors with gliomas resulted in findings for the defense. The majority of cases centered on failure to diagnose occurring before surgery or treatment. Defendants included neurosurgeons, pathologists, radiologists, nurses and hospital systems. Although the number of cases considered here is small, jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs resulted in far higher payouts compared with settlements. CONCLUSIONS Medical malpractice allegations relating to glioma treatment are shown to be rare and infrequent. The majority of cases alleged a failure to appropriately diagnose, before surgery or treatment took place. The great majority of cases reported within WestLaw Precision resulted in jury verdicts for the defense.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

QLTI-15. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND GLIOMA — Celina Crisman, Rose Fluss · Neuro-Oncology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS