CTNI-54. RESPONSE BY RANO2.0 CRITERIA IN ONC201 (DORDAVIPRONE)-TREATED PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT H3 K27M-MUTANT DIFFUSE MIDLINE GLIOMA

Abstract PURPOSE Response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) 2.0 is a recently established response assessment for glial tumors that is agnostic to WHO grade. This updated response assessment includes quantitative evaluation of enhancing and non-enhancing disease and recommendations to account for pseudoprogression. This analysis evaluated response to ONC201 by RANO2.0 in recurrent, H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG), which was previously assessed by RANO-HGG/RANO-LGG (Arrillaga-Romany, JCO, 2024). METHODS Fifty patients with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant DMG were selected based on criteria designed with input from regulators to evaluate objective response to ONC201 monotherapy. Patients had contrast-enhancing, measurable, progressive disease, and were ≥90 days from radiation, with adequate washout from other anti-cancer therapies. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, primary spinal tumors, leptomeningeal spread, or CSF-disseminating tumors were ineligible. Response was assessed using RANO2.0 criteria by two-party blinded independent central review. RESULTS Best response by RANO2.0 included one complete response (CR, 2.0%), nine partial responses (PR, 18.0%), and four minor responses (MR, 8.0%). Overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) by RANO2.0 criteria was 28.0% (n=14; 95%CI, 16-42). Disease control rate (CR+PR+MR+SD) was 40.0% (n=20; 26-55). Median duration of response was 10.4 months (95%CI, 7.4-15.4). Median time to response was 4.6 months (range, 1.6-15.9). 6- and 12-month progression free survival rates were 32.0% (95%CI, 19-47) and 27.0% (15-41), respectively. RANO2.0 response as a time-varying covariate was significantly associated with overall survival in a multivariate analysis considering baseline performance score, multiple enhancing target lesions, enhancing tumor size, and number of prior recurrences (HR [95%CI], 0.22 [0.08–0.58]; p=0.0023). Patients with an objective response by RANO2.0 were more likely to be alive at 12 (100%) and 24 (86%) months, have reduced corticosteroid usage, and have improved performance status. Responses occurred at a higher rate among patients with a higher performance score and fewer target lesions. CONCLUSIONS RANO2.0 assessment of ONC201-treated patients suggests durable and clinically meaningful efficacy in recurrent H3K27M-mutant DMG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0421
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-54. RESPONSE BY RANO2.0 CRITERIA IN ONC201 (DORDAVIPRONE)-TREATED PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT H3 K27M-MUTANT DIFFUSE MIDLINE GLIOMA

Joshua E. Allen, Marissa Barbaro, Patrick Y. Wen, Isabel Arrillaga‐Romany et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

CTNI-54. RESPONSE BY RANO2.0 CRITERIA IN ONC201 (DORDAVIPRONE)-TREATED PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT H3 K27M-MUTANT DIFFUSE MIDLINE GLIOMA

Joshua E. Allen, Marissa Barbaro, Patrick Y. Wen, Isabel Arrillaga‐Romany, Nicole Shonka, Jerome Graber, Lindsay Kilburn, Rohinton S. Tarapore, Aya Haggiagi, Samuel Ramage, John de Groot, Timothy F. Cloughesy, Lynne P. Taylor, Andrew Cluster, Sylvia C. Kurz, Ashley Love Sumrall, Allen S. Melemed, Nicholas Butowski, T. T. Batchelor, Michael Salacz
article en

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE Response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) 2.0 is a recently established response assessment for glial tumors that is agnostic to WHO grade. This updated response assessment includes quantitative evaluation of enhancing and non-enhancing disease and recommendations to account for pseudoprogression. This analysis evaluated response to ONC201 by RANO2.0 in recurrent, H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG), which was previously assessed by RANO-HGG/RANO-LGG (Arrillaga-Romany, JCO, 2024). METHODS Fifty patients with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant DMG were selected based on criteria designed with input from regulators to evaluate objective response to ONC201 monotherapy. Patients had contrast-enhancing, measurable, progressive disease, and were ≥90 days from radiation, with adequate washout from other anti-cancer therapies. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, primary spinal tumors, leptomeningeal spread, or CSF-disseminating tumors were ineligible. Response was assessed using RANO2.0 criteria by two-party blinded independent central review. RESULTS Best response by RANO2.0 included one complete response (CR, 2.0%), nine partial responses (PR, 18.0%), and four minor responses (MR, 8.0%). Overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) by RANO2.0 criteria was 28.0% (n=14; 95%CI, 16-42). Disease control rate (CR+PR+MR+SD) was 40.0% (n=20; 26-55). Median duration of response was 10.4 months (95%CI, 7.4-15.4). Median time to response was 4.6 months (range, 1.6-15.9). 6- and 12-month progression free survival rates were 32.0% (95%CI, 19-47) and 27.0% (15-41), respectively. RANO2.0 response as a time-varying covariate was significantly associated with overall survival in a multivariate analysis considering baseline performance score, multiple enhancing target lesions, enhancing tumor size, and number of prior recurrences (HR [95%CI], 0.22 [0.08–0.58]; p=0.0023). Patients with an objective response by RANO2.0 were more likely to be alive at 12 (100%) and 24 (86%) months, have reduced corticosteroid usage, and have improved performance status. Responses occurred at a higher rate among patients with a higher performance score and fewer target lesions. CONCLUSIONS RANO2.0 assessment of ONC201-treated patients suggests durable and clinically meaningful efficacy in recurrent H3K27M-mutant DMG.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), University of Washington Medical Center (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Levine Cancer Institute (US), Chimerix (United States) (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.