RADT-39. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM BRIDGING RADIOTHERAPY (CNS-BRT) ACHIEVES RAPID CYTOREDUCTION PRIOR TO CAR T-CELL THERAPY FOR AGGRESSIVE B-CELL LYMPHOMAS

Abstract BACKGROUND CAR T-cell therapy (CART) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a promising strategy, yet responses are frequently not durable. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is used for extra-cranial lymphoma to improve CART outcomes through cytoreduction of high-risk lesions. We hypothesized that CNS-BRT would achieve similar, significant cytoreduction prior to CART for CNSL. METHODS We analyzed CNSL patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas who received CNS-BRT prior to commercial CART. Best CNS response post-CART was evaluated using the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG) or RANO for parenchymal or leptomeningeal lesions, respectively. Cytoreduction from CNS-BRT was calculated as change in lesion size prior to CART. RESULTS Twelve patients received CNS-BRT, with median follow up of 11.8m (IQR: 8.5–21.9). Ten had CNSL (9 secondary, 1 primary) and 2 patients had epidural disease (evaluable for toxicity). All ten CNSL patients had progressive disease at the time of CNS-BRT. RT targets included whole brain (n=3), involved site (partial) brain (n=4), involved site spine (n=4), and orbits (n=1) with median dose 24Gy (range: 15-33). 1/12 patients experienced grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 3/12 patients experienced grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). CNS-BRT achieved a 74.0% (95%CI: 62.0–86.0) mean reduction in lesion size from baseline (p=0.014) at a median of only 12d from BRT completion and pre-CART infusion. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses (CR), 1 partial response (PR), and 1 progressive disease (PD). Three patients experienced CNS relapse outside the BRT field for a 12-month estimated risk of CNS progression post-CART of 20.0% (95%CI: 3–49). CONCLUSIONS Early data suggest CNS-BRT achieves rapid cytoreduction and favorable CNS response. The rates of severe CRS/ICANS were similar to comparison series of CNSL patients treated with CART without BRT suggesting an acceptable safety profile. Our data support further study of BRT as a bridging strategy for CNSL-directed CART.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0323
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RADT-39. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM BRIDGING RADIOTHERAPY (CNS-BRT) ACHIEVES RAPID CYTOREDUCTION PRIOR TO CAR T-CELL THERAPY FOR AGGRESSIVE B-CELL LYMPHOMAS

Christian Grommes, Paola Ghione, Gunjan L. Shah, Richard J. Lin et al.
Neuro-Oncology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

RADT-39. CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM BRIDGING RADIOTHERAPY (CNS-BRT) ACHIEVES RAPID CYTOREDUCTION PRIOR TO CAR T-CELL THERAPY FOR AGGRESSIVE B-CELL LYMPHOMAS

Christian Grommes, Paola Ghione, Gunjan L. Shah, Richard J. Lin, Brandon S. Imber, G. Cederquist, Roni Shouval, Sean M. Devlin, Parastoo Bahrami Dahi, Michael Scordo, Beatrice Fregonese, Alexander P. Boardman, Kathryn R. Tringale, Joachim Yahalom, Javin Schefflein, Harper Hubbeling, Carla Hajj, M Lia Palomba, Miguel‐Angel Perales, Gilles Salles, Lorenzo Falchi
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND CAR T-cell therapy (CART) for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a promising strategy, yet responses are frequently not durable. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is used for extra-cranial lymphoma to improve CART outcomes through cytoreduction of high-risk lesions. We hypothesized that CNS-BRT would achieve similar, significant cytoreduction prior to CART for CNSL. METHODS We analyzed CNSL patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas who received CNS-BRT prior to commercial CART. Best CNS response post-CART was evaluated using the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG) or RANO for parenchymal or leptomeningeal lesions, respectively. Cytoreduction from CNS-BRT was calculated as change in lesion size prior to CART. RESULTS Twelve patients received CNS-BRT, with median follow up of 11.8m (IQR: 8.5–21.9). Ten had CNSL (9 secondary, 1 primary) and 2 patients had epidural disease (evaluable for toxicity). All ten CNSL patients had progressive disease at the time of CNS-BRT. RT targets included whole brain (n=3), involved site (partial) brain (n=4), involved site spine (n=4), and orbits (n=1) with median dose 24Gy (range: 15-33). 1/12 patients experienced grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 3/12 patients experienced grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). CNS-BRT achieved a 74.0% (95%CI: 62.0–86.0) mean reduction in lesion size from baseline (p=0.014) at a median of only 12d from BRT completion and pre-CART infusion. Best CNS response included 8 complete responses (CR), 1 partial response (PR), and 1 progressive disease (PD). Three patients experienced CNS relapse outside the BRT field for a 12-month estimated risk of CNS progression post-CART of 20.0% (95%CI: 3–49). CONCLUSIONS Early data suggest CNS-BRT achieves rapid cytoreduction and favorable CNS response. The rates of severe CRS/ICANS were similar to comparison series of CNSL patients treated with CART without BRT suggesting an acceptable safety profile. Our data support further study of BRT as a bridging strategy for CNSL-directed CART.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.