QOL-29. PREVALENCE, MANAGEMENT, AND OUTCOMES OF PROCARBAZINE-ASSOCIATED HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING PCV FOR LOW-GRADE GLIOMA

Abstract Procarbazine is an alkylating agent commonly used to treat low-grade gliomas as part of the PCV regimen. The use of procarbazine is frequently limited by the development of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which often require dose reduction or cessation of procarbazine therapy prior to the completion of a planned treatment course. The prevalence, clinical characteristics, and potential predictors of these reactions are not well defined. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with low-grade glioma who received PCV between January 2016 and January 2024 at a tertiary academic hospital. Data on patient demographics, tumor type, clinical characteristics, treatment course, and hypersensitivity reactions were collected and analyzed. 61 total patients were included. The overall prevalence of HSRs was 60.7% (95% CI: 48.4% - 72.9%). The median cycle during which HSRs occurred was cycle 3 (IQR: 2-4, Range: 1-5). All HSRs involved the development of rash, with 86.5% being pruritic and 21.6% involving the face. Treatments for HSRs included antihistamines (62.2%), topical corticosteroids (35.1%), and systemic corticosteroids (27.0%). Three patients with HSRs presented to the emergency department with concern for anaphylaxis, and one required treatment with epinephrine. Out of six patients rechallenged with procarbazine after experiencing HSRs, one patient redeveloped a diffuse, pruritic rash that resolved with systemic corticosteroids. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between HSRs and gender, age at PCV C1D1, elevated liver enzymes, and concomitant anticonvulsant use, but no significant correlation was observed. In summary, our study provides a contemporary and comprehensive analysis of the prevalence and severity of HSRs to procarbazine in patients with low-grade glioma. The high rate of HSRs in this population, including a relatively high rate of suspected anaphylaxis, should be considered carefully by clinicians in choosing chemotherapy for low-grade glioma and warrants routine counseling and close monitoring.