NIMG-66. DEFINING PROGRESSIVE DISEASE: LOCALIZING VOXEL-AT-RISK ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING USING DEEP LEARNING

Abstract Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of post-treatment glioblastoma (GBM) can be diagnostically challenging in differentiating progressive disease (PD) from coexisting treatment-related changes. The study aim was to train a machine learning model using multiple MRI timepoints from treated GBM patients with subsequent PD or at least six months of tumor-like, persistently stable disease (SD) to estimate PD risk. A retrospective, post-treatment GBM cohort (n=189) with 453 timepoints was identified with available MRI sequences (T1-weighted with and without contrast, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery). PD cases (n=154) showed new, enhancing PD followed by death within 3-6 months; timepoints included the MRI on the PD diagnosis date and the one directly prior. SD cases (n=35) exhibited stable, tumor-like enhancement over timepoints. Cases underwent voxel-wise annotation of PD versus SD. A multiclass, three-dimensional nnU-Net was trained to label voxels as PD, SD, or neither using timepoint sequences with five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the ratio of predicted PD/SD voxels compared to each case’s actual PD or SD status. Classification accuracy of PD versus SD status, PD case-wise sensitivity and specificity, and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis using the PD/SD ratio were presented. The five-fold model ensemble was evaluated on a holdout test set. Validation set performance showed 74.3% accuracy, 0.73 PD case-wise sensitivity, and 0.80 specificity. The holdout set exhibited 79.8% accuracy, 0.81 sensitivity, and 0.78 specificity for PD cases. The ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.80 and 0.83 on the validation and holdout sets, respectively. The model showed high performance and classification accuracy in predicting which voxels were at risk of PD in post-treatment GBM cases. The model also differentiated between PD and SD regions. The model’s predicted PD/SD ratio may be clinically used to stratify patients’ PD risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0830
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NIMG-66. DEFINING PROGRESSIVE DISEASE: LOCALIZING VOXEL-AT-RISK ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING USING DEEP LEARNING

Patrick Yung Wen, Gilbert Youssef, Nicolas Freeman, Ian Pan et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

NIMG-66. DEFINING PROGRESSIVE DISEASE: LOCALIZING VOXEL-AT-RISK ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING USING DEEP LEARNING

Patrick Yung Wen, Gilbert Youssef, Nicolas Freeman, Ian Pan, Raymond Y. Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of post-treatment glioblastoma (GBM) can be diagnostically challenging in differentiating progressive disease (PD) from coexisting treatment-related changes. The study aim was to train a machine learning model using multiple MRI timepoints from treated GBM patients with subsequent PD or at least six months of tumor-like, persistently stable disease (SD) to estimate PD risk. A retrospective, post-treatment GBM cohort (n=189) with 453 timepoints was identified with available MRI sequences (T1-weighted with and without contrast, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery). PD cases (n=154) showed new, enhancing PD followed by death within 3-6 months; timepoints included the MRI on the PD diagnosis date and the one directly prior. SD cases (n=35) exhibited stable, tumor-like enhancement over timepoints. Cases underwent voxel-wise annotation of PD versus SD. A multiclass, three-dimensional nnU-Net was trained to label voxels as PD, SD, or neither using timepoint sequences with five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the ratio of predicted PD/SD voxels compared to each case’s actual PD or SD status. Classification accuracy of PD versus SD status, PD case-wise sensitivity and specificity, and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis using the PD/SD ratio were presented. The five-fold model ensemble was evaluated on a holdout test set. Validation set performance showed 74.3% accuracy, 0.73 PD case-wise sensitivity, and 0.80 specificity. The holdout set exhibited 79.8% accuracy, 0.81 sensitivity, and 0.78 specificity for PD cases. The ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.80 and 0.83 on the validation and holdout sets, respectively. The model showed high performance and classification accuracy in predicting which voxels were at risk of PD in post-treatment GBM cases. The model also differentiated between PD and SD regions. The model’s predicted PD/SD ratio may be clinically used to stratify patients’ PD risk.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Center for Neuro-Oncology (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.