SURG-32. OPTIMIZING TUMOR TREATING FIELDS THERAPY FOR FIRST RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA WITH SKULL REMODELING SURGERY. FINAL RESULTS FROM OPTIMALTTF-2, A MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMIZED, CLINICAL TRIAL

Abstract Studies indicate that increasing the electric field intensity of Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) may prolong survival for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Skull remodeling surgery (SR-surgery) aims to increase electric field intensity by 30-100% by removing the poorly conductive skull, and OptimalTTF-1 (pilot trial) concluded that SR-surgery was safe with a median overall survival (mOS) of 15.5 months for first recurrence GBM (rGBM). OptimalTTF-2 is a 1:1 randomized, comparative, multi-center, investigator-initiated, interventional clinical phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TTFields and standard of care with or without SR-surgery for 84 rGBM subjects, with a planned interim analysis after enrollment of the first 52. Randomization is solely for SR-surgery and involves five burr holes of 15mm each in diameter, located in the skull between the tumor and the transducer arrays. The trial was nationwide in Denmark and active from 2020-2024. Major eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, histopathological confirmed first recurrence of supratentorial GBM, and KPS ≥70. The primary endpoint is OS after 12 months (OS12), while secondary endpoints include PFS, QoL, ORR, QoL, KPS, steroid dose, and toxicity. The trial recruited 58 subjects and 52 had follow-up of 12-months or longer. Randomization was balanced and both arms had a median age of 59 years and no statistical difference in prognostic markers. Intent-to-treat analysis revealed the following for the intervention and control respectively, OS12 55% [95%CI 37-74%] vs. 45% [95%CI 27-64%](p=0.4), mOS 12.2 [7.9-19.1,95%CI] vs. 11 [6.5-17.1, 95%CI] months, and PFS 4.5 [3.4-9.5,95%CI] vs. 3.5 [3-6.4,95%CI] months. All the secondary outcomes were statistically insignificant. The trial was terminated early after interim analysis indicated no survival benefit from SR-surgery and a conditional power calculation that showed a low expected survival benefit for the planned cohort of 84 subjects. Post hoc analysis examining potential negative outcome modifiers is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1112
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SURG-32. OPTIMIZING TUMOR TREATING FIELDS THERAPY FOR FIRST RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA WITH SKULL REMODELING SURGERY. FINAL RESULTS FROM OPTIMALTTF-2, A MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMIZED, CLINICAL TRIAL

Jane Skjøth‐Rasmussen, Nikola Mikic, Ole Solheim, Slávka Lukacova et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

SURG-32. OPTIMIZING TUMOR TREATING FIELDS THERAPY FOR FIRST RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA WITH SKULL REMODELING SURGERY. FINAL RESULTS FROM OPTIMALTTF-2, A MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMIZED, CLINICAL TRIAL

Jane Skjøth‐Rasmussen, Nikola Mikic, Ole Solheim, Slávka Lukacova, Charlotte Aaquist Haslund, Tora S. Solheim, Eric T. Wong, Sören Möller, Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen, Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot, Frantz Rom Poulsen, René Johannes Laursen, Anders Rosendal Korshoej
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studies indicate that increasing the electric field intensity of Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) may prolong survival for glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Skull remodeling surgery (SR-surgery) aims to increase electric field intensity by 30-100% by removing the poorly conductive skull, and OptimalTTF-1 (pilot trial) concluded that SR-surgery was safe with a median overall survival (mOS) of 15.5 months for first recurrence GBM (rGBM). OptimalTTF-2 is a 1:1 randomized, comparative, multi-center, investigator-initiated, interventional clinical phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TTFields and standard of care with or without SR-surgery for 84 rGBM subjects, with a planned interim analysis after enrollment of the first 52. Randomization is solely for SR-surgery and involves five burr holes of 15mm each in diameter, located in the skull between the tumor and the transducer arrays. The trial was nationwide in Denmark and active from 2020-2024. Major eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, histopathological confirmed first recurrence of supratentorial GBM, and KPS ≥70. The primary endpoint is OS after 12 months (OS12), while secondary endpoints include PFS, QoL, ORR, QoL, KPS, steroid dose, and toxicity. The trial recruited 58 subjects and 52 had follow-up of 12-months or longer. Randomization was balanced and both arms had a median age of 59 years and no statistical difference in prognostic markers. Intent-to-treat analysis revealed the following for the intervention and control respectively, OS12 55% [95%CI 37-74%] vs. 45% [95%CI 27-64%](p=0.4), mOS 12.2 [7.9-19.1,95%CI] vs. 11 [6.5-17.1, 95%CI] months, and PFS 4.5 [3.4-9.5,95%CI] vs. 3.5 [3-6.4,95%CI] months. All the secondary outcomes were statistically insignificant. The trial was terminated early after interim analysis indicated no survival benefit from SR-surgery and a conditional power calculation that showed a low expected survival benefit for the planned cohort of 84 subjects. Post hoc analysis examining potential negative outcome modifiers is needed.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Providence College (US), Aarhus University (DK), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Brown University (US), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.