PATH-07. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF DIFFUSE GLIOMA MOLECULAR SUBTYPES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 CNS5 WHO CLASSIFICATION

Abstract BACKGROUND The incorporation of molecular parameters into WHO CNS5 has led to reclassification of many gliomas. We undertook to describe presenting clinical and radiographic features of diffuse adult gliomas according to CNS5 category. METHODS We reviewed pathology reports, clinical and MRI data at presentation of 972 adult patients with glioma diagnosed between 1/2010-2/2022. Continuous variables were presented as median; categorical variables as numbers and percentages, and comparison were performed using chi-square test. RESULTS 736 patients had sufficient data for CNS5 re-classification and were included in the analysis: Grade 2 IDH-mutant (IDHmut) astrocytoma (A2) n=69, grade 3 IDHmut astrocytoma (A3) n=37, grade 4 IDHmut astrocytoma (A4), n=32, grade 2 oligodendroglioma (O2) n=60, grade 3 oligodendroglioma (O3) n=23, and grade 4 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) n=515. Age at presentation significantly differed between grade 2&3 gliomas and grade 4 (mean age:39 versus 61.7; p<0.001); A4 were also younger than GBM (39.8 versus 63.1). A majority in all categories except grade 2 gliomas were male. Seizure was more common in IDHmut gliomas than GBM (58.4% versus 31.8%;p<0.001), while cognitive impairment was more common in GBM than in IDHmut gliomas (64.4% versus 34.4%;p<0.001) and in A4 (64% versus 40.6%;p=0.013). Focal deficits at presentation were more frequent in GBM than in IDHmut gliomas (74.2% versus 30.5%;p<0.001), but not significantly different compared to A4 (74.2% versus 58.1%;p=0.06). Contrast enhancement on MRI was more frequent in GBM compared to IDHmut gliomas (93% versus 48%;p<0.001), but similar frequency with A4 (93% versus 96%;p=1.00). The minimum ADC was significantly higher in IDHmut glioma including A4 than GBM(p<0.001). Calcification was more common in oligodendroglioma than astrocytoma and GBM (p<0.001), and more frequent in A4 than GBM(p=0.016). CONCLUSION Significant differences in the clinical presentation and radiologic features exist among CNS5 glioma subtypes, informing potential diagnosis, management and prognosis at initial presentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0706
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PATH-07. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF DIFFUSE GLIOMA MOLECULAR SUBTYPES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 CNS5 WHO CLASSIFICATION

Reed Gilbow, James T. Patrie, Nicholas Dueck, David Schiff et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

PATH-07. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF DIFFUSE GLIOMA MOLECULAR SUBTYPES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2021 CNS5 WHO CLASSIFICATION

Reed Gilbow, James T. Patrie, Nicholas Dueck, David Schiff, Jasmin Jo, Sohil H. Patel, David Joyner, M. Beatriz S. Lopes, Andrew How, Mark Willy L. Mondia, Josephine Arewa, Andrew Goschka
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The incorporation of molecular parameters into WHO CNS5 has led to reclassification of many gliomas. We undertook to describe presenting clinical and radiographic features of diffuse adult gliomas according to CNS5 category. METHODS We reviewed pathology reports, clinical and MRI data at presentation of 972 adult patients with glioma diagnosed between 1/2010-2/2022. Continuous variables were presented as median; categorical variables as numbers and percentages, and comparison were performed using chi-square test. RESULTS 736 patients had sufficient data for CNS5 re-classification and were included in the analysis: Grade 2 IDH-mutant (IDHmut) astrocytoma (A2) n=69, grade 3 IDHmut astrocytoma (A3) n=37, grade 4 IDHmut astrocytoma (A4), n=32, grade 2 oligodendroglioma (O2) n=60, grade 3 oligodendroglioma (O3) n=23, and grade 4 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) n=515. Age at presentation significantly differed between grade 2&3 gliomas and grade 4 (mean age:39 versus 61.7; p<0.001); A4 were also younger than GBM (39.8 versus 63.1). A majority in all categories except grade 2 gliomas were male. Seizure was more common in IDHmut gliomas than GBM (58.4% versus 31.8%;p<0.001), while cognitive impairment was more common in GBM than in IDHmut gliomas (64.4% versus 34.4%;p<0.001) and in A4 (64% versus 40.6%;p=0.013). Focal deficits at presentation were more frequent in GBM than in IDHmut gliomas (74.2% versus 30.5%;p<0.001), but not significantly different compared to A4 (74.2% versus 58.1%;p=0.06). Contrast enhancement on MRI was more frequent in GBM compared to IDHmut gliomas (93% versus 48%;p<0.001), but similar frequency with A4 (93% versus 96%;p=1.00). The minimum ADC was significantly higher in IDHmut glioma including A4 than GBM(p<0.001). Calcification was more common in oligodendroglioma than astrocytoma and GBM (p<0.001), and more frequent in A4 than GBM(p=0.016). CONCLUSION Significant differences in the clinical presentation and radiologic features exist among CNS5 glioma subtypes, informing potential diagnosis, management and prognosis at initial presentation.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
East Carolina University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.