NCMP-03. ASSOCIATION OF PROGESTERONE CONTRACEPTION WITH TUMOR-RELATED VISUAL IMPAIRMENT IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH MENINGIOMA REFERRED FOR RADIATION

Abstract BACKGROUND Meningiomas express ER/PR, but hormonal risk is poorly characterized and not always considered. We hypothesized that hormonal contraceptives lead to tumor-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiation. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study with primary endpoint visual deficit prior to radiation for meningioma in women age ≤55. Key risk factors determined included age, grade, skull base location, hormonal supplementation / contraception, and neurofibromatosis / prior radiation (NF/priorRT). Univariate and multivariate (including factors with p<0.05 on univariate) logistic regression was performed to analyze associations with visual deficit. RESULTS 64 women (median age 46) receiving RT from 2012-2024 at a single academic institution were included. 45 (70%) had skull base tumors, 33 (52%) used estrogen or progesterone, and 23 (36%) used unopposed progesterone only, 15 specifically medroxyprogesterone acetate (Provera). Visual deficit was present in 35 patients (55%) and was independently associated with both skull base location (p=0.002, OR 11.5) and unopposed progesterone only use (p=0.008, OR 12) but not estrogen or progesterone use on multivariate analysis. Proportion with progesterone only use was 57% vs. 11% in patients with vs. without visual deficit (chi-sq p<0.001). In 5 with ER/PR testing, 3 were PR+ (all with visual deficits and history of medroxyprogesterone acetate) and 2 were PR- (neither with visual deficits nor hormone use). 13 women (20%) were actively using progesterone during RT. 17 women have been contacted at time of analysis, and 4 discontinued progesterone. CONCLUSIONS Progesterone increases risk for meningioma-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiotherapy, with a disproportionate number on Provera specifically. These data highlight the importance of age-appropriate counseling, consistent pathologic assessment of ER/PR status, and greater awareness of this issue amongst neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0856
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NCMP-03. ASSOCIATION OF PROGESTERONE CONTRACEPTION WITH TUMOR-RELATED VISUAL IMPAIRMENT IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH MENINGIOMA REFERRED FOR RADIATION

John C. Breneman, Kevin Shiue, M Bailey, Ady Kendler et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
article

NCMP-03. ASSOCIATION OF PROGESTERONE CONTRACEPTION WITH TUMOR-RELATED VISUAL IMPAIRMENT IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH MENINGIOMA REFERRED FOR RADIATION

John C. Breneman, Kevin Shiue, M Bailey, Ady Kendler, Luke Pater, Timothy Struve, R Rossi, Rekha Chaudhary, Andrew J. Frankart, Kyle Wang, Norberto Andaluz, Jonathan A. Forbes, Matthew W. Hagen, Lalanthica Yogendran, Ralph E. Vatner, Sarah M. C. Sittenfeld, C. Avery
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Meningiomas express ER/PR, but hormonal risk is poorly characterized and not always considered. We hypothesized that hormonal contraceptives lead to tumor-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiation. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study with primary endpoint visual deficit prior to radiation for meningioma in women age ≤55. Key risk factors determined included age, grade, skull base location, hormonal supplementation / contraception, and neurofibromatosis / prior radiation (NF/priorRT). Univariate and multivariate (including factors with p<0.05 on univariate) logistic regression was performed to analyze associations with visual deficit. RESULTS 64 women (median age 46) receiving RT from 2012-2024 at a single academic institution were included. 45 (70%) had skull base tumors, 33 (52%) used estrogen or progesterone, and 23 (36%) used unopposed progesterone only, 15 specifically medroxyprogesterone acetate (Provera). Visual deficit was present in 35 patients (55%) and was independently associated with both skull base location (p=0.002, OR 11.5) and unopposed progesterone only use (p=0.008, OR 12) but not estrogen or progesterone use on multivariate analysis. Proportion with progesterone only use was 57% vs. 11% in patients with vs. without visual deficit (chi-sq p<0.001). In 5 with ER/PR testing, 3 were PR+ (all with visual deficits and history of medroxyprogesterone acetate) and 2 were PR- (neither with visual deficits nor hormone use). 13 women (20%) were actively using progesterone during RT. 17 women have been contacted at time of analysis, and 4 discontinued progesterone. CONCLUSIONS Progesterone increases risk for meningioma-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiotherapy, with a disproportionate number on Provera specifically. These data highlight the importance of age-appropriate counseling, consistent pathologic assessment of ER/PR status, and greater awareness of this issue amongst neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.