NCMP-03. ASSOCIATION OF PROGESTERONE CONTRACEPTION WITH TUMOR-RELATED VISUAL IMPAIRMENT IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH MENINGIOMA REFERRED FOR RADIATION
Abstract BACKGROUND Meningiomas express ER/PR, but hormonal risk is poorly characterized and not always considered. We hypothesized that hormonal contraceptives lead to tumor-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiation. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study with primary endpoint visual deficit prior to radiation for meningioma in women age ≤55. Key risk factors determined included age, grade, skull base location, hormonal supplementation / contraception, and neurofibromatosis / prior radiation (NF/priorRT). Univariate and multivariate (including factors with p<0.05 on univariate) logistic regression was performed to analyze associations with visual deficit. RESULTS 64 women (median age 46) receiving RT from 2012-2024 at a single academic institution were included. 45 (70%) had skull base tumors, 33 (52%) used estrogen or progesterone, and 23 (36%) used unopposed progesterone only, 15 specifically medroxyprogesterone acetate (Provera). Visual deficit was present in 35 patients (55%) and was independently associated with both skull base location (p=0.002, OR 11.5) and unopposed progesterone only use (p=0.008, OR 12) but not estrogen or progesterone use on multivariate analysis. Proportion with progesterone only use was 57% vs. 11% in patients with vs. without visual deficit (chi-sq p<0.001). In 5 with ER/PR testing, 3 were PR+ (all with visual deficits and history of medroxyprogesterone acetate) and 2 were PR- (neither with visual deficits nor hormone use). 13 women (20%) were actively using progesterone during RT. 17 women have been contacted at time of analysis, and 4 discontinued progesterone. CONCLUSIONS Progesterone increases risk for meningioma-related visual deficits in premenopausal women referred for radiotherapy, with a disproportionate number on Provera specifically. These data highlight the importance of age-appropriate counseling, consistent pathologic assessment of ER/PR status, and greater awareness of this issue amongst neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists.
Authors
- John C. Breneman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-0252)
- Kevin Shiue (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-9241)
- M Bailey
- Ady Kendler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1327-8796)
- Luke Pater (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-8464)
- Timothy Struve (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0427-3706)
- R Rossi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1878-8831)
- Rekha Chaudhary (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8068-8129)
- Andrew J. Frankart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-6511)
- Kyle Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-021X)
- Norberto Andaluz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7553-0685)
- Jonathan A. Forbes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0994-6949)
- Matthew W. Hagen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-2262)
- Lalanthica Yogendran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-5502)
- Ralph E. Vatner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-0989)
- Sarah M. C. Sittenfeld
- C. Avery
Institutions
- Indiana University School of Medicine
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neuro-Oncology
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0856
- Primary Topic
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00