QLTI-16. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (QIPR) FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ONCOLOGY CLINICAL CARE

Abstract BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been used to assess individuals’ quality of life (QoL) throughout cancer treatment. Individuals with cancer often experience physical, psychological, and social challenges. It is crucial to evaluate their QoL to provide supportive care services to improve survival and treatment outcomes in real-world cancer clinical settings. Patients’ ability to engage with completing PROs is critical to ensuring PRO implementation efficacy. This QIPR (UF: 2216) examined these completion rates in coordinated medical-behavioral cancer care. METHODS Questionnaires delivered to neuro-oncology and psycho-oncology patients through the electronic health record (EHR) prior to scheduled office visits were: PROMIS – Anxiety, Depression, Pain Interference, Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and Cognitive and Physical Function. Data collection occurred from July 2023-January 2024. Descriptive statistics were calculated to assess battery completion rates. Information from the first 3 encounters following initiation of the battery into clinical practice were analyzed. RESULTS Of 906 scheduled encounters, 491 (54.2%) were attended by 280 unique patients. The battery was completed at least once by 106 (37.9%) patients. 72.6% (N=77) of these patients completed the battery at the first scheduled visit at which it was assigned. Of patients with 2 scheduled visits (N=25, 23.6%); 24.0% (N=6) completed the battery at both visits. Of patients that had 3 scheduled visits (N=12, 11.3%); 16.7% (N=2) completed it at all 3 visits. CONCLUSION Only approximately 38% of patients completed the battery at least once across 3 consecutive visits. The highest battery completion rate was at the first visit at which it was assigned. Completion rates were lower across additional visits. Future work will seek to understand barriers and facilitators of these completion rates to optimize implementation of PROs in coordinated medical-behavioral oncology care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1030
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QLTI-16. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (QIPR) FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ONCOLOGY CLINICAL CARE

Drashti Patel, Anjelica Body, Ashley Ghiaseddin, Deidre Pereira et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

QLTI-16. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (QIPR) FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ONCOLOGY CLINICAL CARE

Drashti Patel, Anjelica Body, Ashley Ghiaseddin, Deidre Pereira, Hannah Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been used to assess individuals’ quality of life (QoL) throughout cancer treatment. Individuals with cancer often experience physical, psychological, and social challenges. It is crucial to evaluate their QoL to provide supportive care services to improve survival and treatment outcomes in real-world cancer clinical settings. Patients’ ability to engage with completing PROs is critical to ensuring PRO implementation efficacy. This QIPR (UF: 2216) examined these completion rates in coordinated medical-behavioral cancer care. METHODS Questionnaires delivered to neuro-oncology and psycho-oncology patients through the electronic health record (EHR) prior to scheduled office visits were: PROMIS – Anxiety, Depression, Pain Interference, Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and Cognitive and Physical Function. Data collection occurred from July 2023-January 2024. Descriptive statistics were calculated to assess battery completion rates. Information from the first 3 encounters following initiation of the battery into clinical practice were analyzed. RESULTS Of 906 scheduled encounters, 491 (54.2%) were attended by 280 unique patients. The battery was completed at least once by 106 (37.9%) patients. 72.6% (N=77) of these patients completed the battery at the first scheduled visit at which it was assigned. Of patients with 2 scheduled visits (N=25, 23.6%); 24.0% (N=6) completed the battery at both visits. Of patients that had 3 scheduled visits (N=12, 11.3%); 16.7% (N=2) completed it at all 3 visits. CONCLUSION Only approximately 38% of patients completed the battery at least once across 3 consecutive visits. The highest battery completion rate was at the first visit at which it was assigned. Completion rates were lower across additional visits. Future work will seek to understand barriers and facilitators of these completion rates to optimize implementation of PROs in coordinated medical-behavioral oncology care.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.