NIMG-59. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM GLIOBLASTOMA SURVIVORS USING MACHINE LEARNING GENERATED RADIO-PATHOMIC METRICS

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most devastating central nervous system malignancy with poor overall survival (OS), even with gross total resection (GTR) and chemoradiation. Identifying factors associated with long-term survival (LTS) in GBM patients is challenging but crucial for improving prognostic models. This study compares an internal dataset of the top 10% long-term survivors of GBM (n=14) against a combined external cohort of 528 GBM patients who underwent GTR. METHODS We used a previously published machine learning-generated radio-pathomic model based on autopsy tissue as ground-truth to generate whole-brain maps of cell density and tumor probability maps (TPM) using conventional preoperative MRI sequences in both our internal dataset and a combined external cohort of GBM patients who underwent GTR from the UCSF-PDGM-v2 and UPenn-GBM databases. We then analyzed clinical and radio-pathomic metrics, including cell density and TPM values within contrast-enhancing (CE) and FLAIR hyperintense regions. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-tests. RESULTS Cell density metrics showed significant differences, with lower cell density in contrast-enhancing regions (t-value: 4.709, p<0.001; median: 1559 vs. 1959) and in FLAIR hyperintense regions (t-value: 3.585, p<0.001; median: 1356 vs. 1568) within the LTS group. TPM metrics also showed significant differences, with lower TPM values in contrast-enhancing regions (t-value: 3.312, p<0.001; median: 0.71 vs. 0.72) and in non-enhancing regions (t-value: 2.606, p<0.01; median: 0.68 vs. 0.69) in the LTS group. CONCLUSION Our comparative analysis reveals distinct radio-pathomic characteristics associated with long-term survival in GBM patients. Reduced cell density and lower TPM values in both contrast-enhancing and FLAIR hyperintense regions are significantly correlated with long-term survival. These findings suggest that integrating radio-pathomic data may enhance prognostic models and warrants further studies evaluating the relationship of these markers and OS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0823
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NIMG-59. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM GLIOBLASTOMA SURVIVORS USING MACHINE LEARNING GENERATED RADIO-PATHOMIC METRICS

Fitzgerald Kyereme, Daniel Aaronson, Max Krucoff, Biprojit Nath et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

NIMG-59. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM GLIOBLASTOMA SURVIVORS USING MACHINE LEARNING GENERATED RADIO-PATHOMIC METRICS

Fitzgerald Kyereme, Daniel Aaronson, Max Krucoff, Biprojit Nath, Kelly Mrachek, Aleksandra Winiarz, Peter S. LaViolette, Anjishnu Banerjee, Samuel Bobholz, Savannah Duenweg, Allison K. Lowman, Jennifer Connelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most devastating central nervous system malignancy with poor overall survival (OS), even with gross total resection (GTR) and chemoradiation. Identifying factors associated with long-term survival (LTS) in GBM patients is challenging but crucial for improving prognostic models. This study compares an internal dataset of the top 10% long-term survivors of GBM (n=14) against a combined external cohort of 528 GBM patients who underwent GTR. METHODS We used a previously published machine learning-generated radio-pathomic model based on autopsy tissue as ground-truth to generate whole-brain maps of cell density and tumor probability maps (TPM) using conventional preoperative MRI sequences in both our internal dataset and a combined external cohort of GBM patients who underwent GTR from the UCSF-PDGM-v2 and UPenn-GBM databases. We then analyzed clinical and radio-pathomic metrics, including cell density and TPM values within contrast-enhancing (CE) and FLAIR hyperintense regions. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-tests. RESULTS Cell density metrics showed significant differences, with lower cell density in contrast-enhancing regions (t-value: 4.709, p<0.001; median: 1559 vs. 1959) and in FLAIR hyperintense regions (t-value: 3.585, p<0.001; median: 1356 vs. 1568) within the LTS group. TPM metrics also showed significant differences, with lower TPM values in contrast-enhancing regions (t-value: 3.312, p<0.001; median: 0.71 vs. 0.72) and in non-enhancing regions (t-value: 2.606, p<0.01; median: 0.68 vs. 0.69) in the LTS group. CONCLUSION Our comparative analysis reveals distinct radio-pathomic characteristics associated with long-term survival in GBM patients. Reduced cell density and lower TPM values in both contrast-enhancing and FLAIR hyperintense regions are significantly correlated with long-term survival. These findings suggest that integrating radio-pathomic data may enhance prognostic models and warrants further studies evaluating the relationship of these markers and OS.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.