BIOM-67. DIFFERENTIAL DNA METHYLATION PATTERNS IN THE CSF OF PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE GLIOMAS

Abstract Studies have shown that different central nervous system (CNS) tumor types exhibit unique DNA methylation profiles. DNA methylation-based machine learning classification of CNS tumor tissue has been demonstrated to be highly-accurate in differentiating between tumor types, including between diffuse glioma subtypes. While similar analyses have been performed using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood, few studies have looked at the potential of DNA methylation as a biomarker for diffuse gliomas using CSF-derived cfDNA. In this study, we analyzed CSF cfDNA methylation patterns in diffuse glioma patients. DNA methylation profiling of CSF of patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM) (n=37), IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas (n=12), and non-neoplastic conditions (n=5) was performed using cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq). Methylation quantification was estimated for each genomic region. Significance testing was performed between diagnostic groups to discover differentially-methylated regions (DMRs). The 300 most differentially-methylated regions (DMRs) for each comparison (IDH-wildtype vs. IDH-mutant, IDH-mutant vs. control, IDH-wildtype vs. control), for a total of 900 DMRs, were utilized as features in dimensionality reduction analysis and machine learning. Out of ~1×107 defined genomic regions, there were ~7×105 DMRs between GBM and control samples and ~1.5×106 DMRs between GBM and IDH-mutant samples, accounting for ~7% and ~15% of the genome, respectively. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that samples were mostly clustered by diagnosis. Random forest analysis of the 900 DMRs with an 80/20 train/test split resulted in an overall accuracy of 0.815. In conclusion, CSF cfDNA methylation profiles of diffuse glioma patients exhibit differential methylation patterns between IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype tumors, as well as between tumor and control, and could be informative biomarkers for the diagnosis of patients with diffuse gliomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0139
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIOM-67. DIFFERENTIAL DNA METHYLATION PATTERNS IN THE CSF OF PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE GLIOMAS

Chirag B. Patel, Sophia Nguyen, Jason T. Huse, Frederick F. Lang et al.
1 citations
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.44
article

BIOM-67. DIFFERENTIAL DNA METHYLATION PATTERNS IN THE CSF OF PATIENTS WITH DIFFUSE GLIOMAS

Chirag B. Patel, Sophia Nguyen, Jason T. Huse, Frederick F. Lang, Srividya Arjuna, Leomar Y. Ballester, Mauli Shah, Brittany C. Parker Kerrigan, Antonio Dono, Yoshua Esquenazi, Daniel Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Studies have shown that different central nervous system (CNS) tumor types exhibit unique DNA methylation profiles. DNA methylation-based machine learning classification of CNS tumor tissue has been demonstrated to be highly-accurate in differentiating between tumor types, including between diffuse glioma subtypes. While similar analyses have been performed using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood, few studies have looked at the potential of DNA methylation as a biomarker for diffuse gliomas using CSF-derived cfDNA. In this study, we analyzed CSF cfDNA methylation patterns in diffuse glioma patients. DNA methylation profiling of CSF of patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM) (n=37), IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas (n=12), and non-neoplastic conditions (n=5) was performed using cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq). Methylation quantification was estimated for each genomic region. Significance testing was performed between diagnostic groups to discover differentially-methylated regions (DMRs). The 300 most differentially-methylated regions (DMRs) for each comparison (IDH-wildtype vs. IDH-mutant, IDH-mutant vs. control, IDH-wildtype vs. control), for a total of 900 DMRs, were utilized as features in dimensionality reduction analysis and machine learning. Out of ~1×107 defined genomic regions, there were ~7×105 DMRs between GBM and control samples and ~1.5×106 DMRs between GBM and IDH-mutant samples, accounting for ~7% and ~15% of the genome, respectively. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering analysis revealed that samples were mostly clustered by diagnosis. Random forest analysis of the 900 DMRs with an 80/20 train/test split resulted in an overall accuracy of 0.815. In conclusion, CSF cfDNA methylation profiles of diffuse glioma patients exhibit differential methylation patterns between IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype tumors, as well as between tumor and control, and could be informative biomarkers for the diagnosis of patients with diffuse gliomas.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Memorial Hermann (US), Texas Medical Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.