PATH-18. CURRENT STATUS OF CANCER GENOMIC PROFILING (CGP) TESTS IN BRAIN TUMOR TREATMENT - COMPLEMENTING BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CGP-

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests are currently used in the search for therapeutic targets and have become an auxiliary tool in diagnosis according to the new WHO classification (WHO 2021), which requires the integration of pathomorphological and molecular diagnostics. Here, we report on brain tumor cases at our institution that underwent CGP testing. METHODS From May 2020 to the present, 27 brain tumor cases that underwent CGP testing at our institution were included in this study. There were 14 males and 13 females, ranging from 18 to 70 years (average 48.4 years). The tests conducted included Foundation One CDx, GeneMineTop, and NCC OncoPanel. RESULTS The cases that underwent CGP testing included 13 cases of glioblastoma IDH-wildtype, 3 cases of astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 4, 4 cases of astrocytoma IDH-mutant, grade 3, 3 cases of oligodendroglioma, 1p/19q codeleted, grade 3, 1 case of astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 2, 1 case of ependymoma, 1 case of pilocytic astrocytoma and 1 case of PitNEC. CGP testing enabled molecular diagnostics such as IDH mutation and TERTp mutation. Based on the results, therapeutic suggestions were possible for 5 out of 25 cases (20%) (BRAF V600E mutation 1 case, IDH1 R132H mutation 1 case, TMB high 3 cases). Checkpoint inhibitors were used in a case with high TMB. Genetic risk assessment by a genetic counselor was conducted for all cases, and one high TMB case was diagnosed as hereditary cancer. A germline pathogenic variant in MSH6 was detected, leading to a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSION Molecular diagnostics through CGP testing served as an aid in diagnosis according to WHO2021. Cases where drug suggestions were feasible underwent treatment with targeted molecular therapies and checkpoint inhibitor. We experienced cases where hereditary cancer syndromes such as Lynch syndrome were diagnosed through the detection of germline pathogenic variants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0717
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PATH-18. CURRENT STATUS OF CANCER GENOMIC PROFILING (CGP) TESTS IN BRAIN TUMOR TREATMENT - COMPLEMENTING BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CGP-

S. Baba, Tomohiro Yamasaki, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Satoru Kida et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

PATH-18. CURRENT STATUS OF CANCER GENOMIC PROFILING (CGP) TESTS IN BRAIN TUMOR TREATMENT - COMPLEMENTING BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS WITH CGP-

S. Baba, Tomohiro Yamasaki, Kazuhiko Kurozumi, Satoru Kida, Tomoya Oishi, Karaki Shin‐ichiro
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cancer genomic profiling (CGP) tests are currently used in the search for therapeutic targets and have become an auxiliary tool in diagnosis according to the new WHO classification (WHO 2021), which requires the integration of pathomorphological and molecular diagnostics. Here, we report on brain tumor cases at our institution that underwent CGP testing. METHODS From May 2020 to the present, 27 brain tumor cases that underwent CGP testing at our institution were included in this study. There were 14 males and 13 females, ranging from 18 to 70 years (average 48.4 years). The tests conducted included Foundation One CDx, GeneMineTop, and NCC OncoPanel. RESULTS The cases that underwent CGP testing included 13 cases of glioblastoma IDH-wildtype, 3 cases of astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 4, 4 cases of astrocytoma IDH-mutant, grade 3, 3 cases of oligodendroglioma, 1p/19q codeleted, grade 3, 1 case of astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 2, 1 case of ependymoma, 1 case of pilocytic astrocytoma and 1 case of PitNEC. CGP testing enabled molecular diagnostics such as IDH mutation and TERTp mutation. Based on the results, therapeutic suggestions were possible for 5 out of 25 cases (20%) (BRAF V600E mutation 1 case, IDH1 R132H mutation 1 case, TMB high 3 cases). Checkpoint inhibitors were used in a case with high TMB. Genetic risk assessment by a genetic counselor was conducted for all cases, and one high TMB case was diagnosed as hereditary cancer. A germline pathogenic variant in MSH6 was detected, leading to a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSION Molecular diagnostics through CGP testing served as an aid in diagnosis according to WHO2021. Cases where drug suggestions were feasible underwent treatment with targeted molecular therapies and checkpoint inhibitor. We experienced cases where hereditary cancer syndromes such as Lynch syndrome were diagnosed through the detection of germline pathogenic variants.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.