SURG-35. NEURONAVIGATED INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASSOUND X SODIUM FLUORESCEIN FOR BRAIN METASTASIS: WHICH IS BETTER?

Abstract BACKGROUND Improve quality of life with a maximum surgical resection is the main goal of neurosurgeons. Brain metastasis are even more prevalent because of patients are living more. The grade of resection and the maintenance of a good performance are fundamental for these patients perform adjuvant radiotherapy. There are several technologies that may help. Considering two of them that have an easier access and are cheaper, we compared a high definition ultrasound (BK 3000) coupled to neuronavigation system (Brainlab) and sodium fluorescein (SF). METHODS Adult patients with main radiological hypothesis of brain metastasis were included in a PhD study previously approved by ethics committee. 3-5mg/kg of SF was administered by intravenous infusion during anesthetic induction. An specific craniotomy transducer was used in all cases with shift correction in real time by neuronavigator. All procedures were guided by the same neurosurgeon. RESULTS High definition ultrasound allows an excellent tumor delimitation. SF helped to increase grade of resection however made confusion about what is infiltration and what is tumor and for this ultrasound were superior. Increased fluorescence is easily detected when compared to ultrasound information’s.. For both technologies, when the surgical site had blood, the evaluation about grade of resection is not accurate because in ultrasound appears a posterior shadow and considering SF it seems that there are not further tumor because blood does not have increased fluorescence. CONCLUSIONS US and SF are different tools which improve brain metastasis resection. In each moment of surgery one technology was superior or not. We used an specific probe for neurosurgery that has high quality and allowed detailed evaluations. These technologies helps surgeons take quick decision and optimized brain tumor removal. The neurosurgeon should be more familiar to US images because provide a real time evaluation with low cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1115
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SURG-35. NEURONAVIGATED INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASSOUND X SODIUM FLUORESCEIN FOR BRAIN METASTASIS: WHICH IS BETTER?

Aline Lariessy Campos Paiva, Jean Gonçalves de Oliveira, Renan Maximilian Lovato, José Carlos Esteves Veiga et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

SURG-35. NEURONAVIGATED INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASSOUND X SODIUM FLUORESCEIN FOR BRAIN METASTASIS: WHICH IS BETTER?

Aline Lariessy Campos Paiva, Jean Gonçalves de Oliveira, Renan Maximilian Lovato, José Carlos Esteves Veiga, João Luiz Vitorino Araujo
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Improve quality of life with a maximum surgical resection is the main goal of neurosurgeons. Brain metastasis are even more prevalent because of patients are living more. The grade of resection and the maintenance of a good performance are fundamental for these patients perform adjuvant radiotherapy. There are several technologies that may help. Considering two of them that have an easier access and are cheaper, we compared a high definition ultrasound (BK 3000) coupled to neuronavigation system (Brainlab) and sodium fluorescein (SF). METHODS Adult patients with main radiological hypothesis of brain metastasis were included in a PhD study previously approved by ethics committee. 3-5mg/kg of SF was administered by intravenous infusion during anesthetic induction. An specific craniotomy transducer was used in all cases with shift correction in real time by neuronavigator. All procedures were guided by the same neurosurgeon. RESULTS High definition ultrasound allows an excellent tumor delimitation. SF helped to increase grade of resection however made confusion about what is infiltration and what is tumor and for this ultrasound were superior. Increased fluorescence is easily detected when compared to ultrasound information’s.. For both technologies, when the surgical site had blood, the evaluation about grade of resection is not accurate because in ultrasound appears a posterior shadow and considering SF it seems that there are not further tumor because blood does not have increased fluorescence. CONCLUSIONS US and SF are different tools which improve brain metastasis resection. In each moment of surgery one technology was superior or not. We used an specific probe for neurosurgery that has high quality and allowed detailed evaluations. These technologies helps surgeons take quick decision and optimized brain tumor removal. The neurosurgeon should be more familiar to US images because provide a real time evaluation with low cost.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.