TMOD-32. MURINE MODELLING OF THE STING PATHWAY IN GLIOMAS

Abstract The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is a critical component of innate antitumor immunity through the recognition of pathogenic cytosolic DNA and stimulating the production of type 1 interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokines. We have previously shown that STING signaling is silenced in the neoplastic compartment of the GBM tumor microenvironment, but remains intact in vascular and immune cells. In human patient derived cell lines, such silencing appears to be mediated by hypermethylation of a region of the STING promoter and can be reversed by treatment with both the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor Decitabine and DNMT1-selective inhibitor GSK-3685032. These results suggest that neoplastic cell STING promoter methylation represents a therapeutic vulnerability that can be exploited by epigenetic therapies to inflame the glioma tumor microenvironment. Murine models are critical tools for exploring the translational implications of STING silencing in vivo. Distinct mouse models have been developed to optimally represent specific aspects of human glioma biology. Here we characterize the STING pathway in commonly used syngeneic murine glioma models, including CT2A, GL261, SB28, and SMA560. We show that the expression of STING pathway components varies significantly across these lines. Importantly, unlike in humans, murine STING (mSTING) expression is not suppressed by promoter methylation and does not respond to decitabine treatment. Additionally, the mSTING protein is expressed in neoplastic cells in vivo. These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in epigenetic regulation of STING between human and murine glioma cells, and suggest that murine modeling of STING epigenetics requires the use of patient derived cell lines implanted in immunodeficient mice. Meanwhile, immune competent syngeneic models are appropriate for exploring the tumor immune microenvironment but would require non-epigenetic approaches (e.g. genetic knock-outs/knock-ins) for modulating STING expression. Humanized mice represent a promising emerging approach for faithfully recapitulating both epigenetic control and immune environment of human gliomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1296
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TMOD-32. MURINE MODELLING OF THE STING PATHWAY IN GLIOMAS

Justin Low, Virginia Wertman, Emiley Gibson, David M. Ashley et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

TMOD-32. MURINE MODELLING OF THE STING PATHWAY IN GLIOMAS

Justin Low, Virginia Wertman, Emiley Gibson, David M. Ashley, Michelle Bowie, Eric Baker, Rebecca Fuller, Patrick Lang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is a critical component of innate antitumor immunity through the recognition of pathogenic cytosolic DNA and stimulating the production of type 1 interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokines. We have previously shown that STING signaling is silenced in the neoplastic compartment of the GBM tumor microenvironment, but remains intact in vascular and immune cells. In human patient derived cell lines, such silencing appears to be mediated by hypermethylation of a region of the STING promoter and can be reversed by treatment with both the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor Decitabine and DNMT1-selective inhibitor GSK-3685032. These results suggest that neoplastic cell STING promoter methylation represents a therapeutic vulnerability that can be exploited by epigenetic therapies to inflame the glioma tumor microenvironment. Murine models are critical tools for exploring the translational implications of STING silencing in vivo. Distinct mouse models have been developed to optimally represent specific aspects of human glioma biology. Here we characterize the STING pathway in commonly used syngeneic murine glioma models, including CT2A, GL261, SB28, and SMA560. We show that the expression of STING pathway components varies significantly across these lines. Importantly, unlike in humans, murine STING (mSTING) expression is not suppressed by promoter methylation and does not respond to decitabine treatment. Additionally, the mSTING protein is expressed in neoplastic cells in vivo. These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in epigenetic regulation of STING between human and murine glioma cells, and suggest that murine modeling of STING epigenetics requires the use of patient derived cell lines implanted in immunodeficient mice. Meanwhile, immune competent syngeneic models are appropriate for exploring the tumor immune microenvironment but would require non-epigenetic approaches (e.g. genetic knock-outs/knock-ins) for modulating STING expression. Humanized mice represent a promising emerging approach for faithfully recapitulating both epigenetic control and immune environment of human gliomas.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Duke University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.