BIOS-05. PEPTIDE-BASED VACCINES VERSUS DENDRITIC CELL-BASED VACCINE THERAPIES FOR PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent primary CNS malignancy in adults, often with a bleak prognosis. Reports suggest the efficacy of dendritic cell vaccines (DCV) and peptide vaccines in extending overall survival (OS). We aimed to compare their efficacy using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane database, SCOPUS, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to February 2024 for controlled trials on DCV or peptide vaccines for GBM. NMA was conducted using the frequentist approach to obtain direct and indirect comparisons of each vaccine. Pairwise analyses were performed using the inverse variance method, comparing each vaccine’s efficacy. PEPvIII-KLH and Rindopepimut were merged into “Peptide-based vaccines” [PEP], and standard of care (SOC) and (Placebo + SOC) were merged. Primary outcome: hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Analysis included 5 studies with 451 patients (vaccine arm) and 445 controls, with SOC/[Placebo + SOC] as reference. Common effects model showed DCV + SOC significantly reduced the HR to 0.3385 [0.1753; 0.6539], while the peptide-based vaccine + SOC reduced the HR to 0.8276 [0.6960; 0.9840]. In the random effects model, DCV + SOC had an HR of 0.3132 [0.0839; 1.1688], and the peptide-based vaccine + SOC had an HR of 0.3888 [0.1383; 1.0928]. Heterogeneity: tau^2 = 0.6473, tau = 0.8045, I^2 = 77.7% [39.5%; 91.8%]. In a pairwise meta-analysis comparing the DCV+SOC and SOC/[Placebo + SOC] consisting of 2 trials, the common and random effects models both estimated an HR of 0.3385 [0.1753; 0.6539, I^2 = 0.0%]. Comparing the PEP+SOC and SOC/[Placebo + SOC] based on 3 trials, the common effect model estimated an HR of 0.8276 [0.6960; 0.9840], while the random effects model estimated an HR of 0.3874 [0.1360; 1.1039, I^2 = 84.4%]. CONCLUSION Based on current evidence, DCV vaccines perform better than peptide-based vaccines in reducing mortality in GBM patients. Further trials are required to validate their efficacies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0153
Primary Topic
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIOS-05. PEPTIDE-BASED VACCINES VERSUS DENDRITIC CELL-BASED VACCINE THERAPIES FOR PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS

Mainak Bardhan, Vivek Podder, Debankur Dey, Yazmín Odia et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
article

BIOS-05. PEPTIDE-BASED VACCINES VERSUS DENDRITIC CELL-BASED VACCINE THERAPIES FOR PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS

Mainak Bardhan, Vivek Podder, Debankur Dey, Yazmín Odia, Vinay Suresh, Suhrud Panchawagh, Zhijian Chen, Archit Goel, Adeeb Ali Mohammad
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent primary CNS malignancy in adults, often with a bleak prognosis. Reports suggest the efficacy of dendritic cell vaccines (DCV) and peptide vaccines in extending overall survival (OS). We aimed to compare their efficacy using network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane database, SCOPUS, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to February 2024 for controlled trials on DCV or peptide vaccines for GBM. NMA was conducted using the frequentist approach to obtain direct and indirect comparisons of each vaccine. Pairwise analyses were performed using the inverse variance method, comparing each vaccine’s efficacy. PEPvIII-KLH and Rindopepimut were merged into “Peptide-based vaccines” [PEP], and standard of care (SOC) and (Placebo + SOC) were merged. Primary outcome: hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Analysis included 5 studies with 451 patients (vaccine arm) and 445 controls, with SOC/[Placebo + SOC] as reference. Common effects model showed DCV + SOC significantly reduced the HR to 0.3385 [0.1753; 0.6539], while the peptide-based vaccine + SOC reduced the HR to 0.8276 [0.6960; 0.9840]. In the random effects model, DCV + SOC had an HR of 0.3132 [0.0839; 1.1688], and the peptide-based vaccine + SOC had an HR of 0.3888 [0.1383; 1.0928]. Heterogeneity: tau^2 = 0.6473, tau = 0.8045, I^2 = 77.7% [39.5%; 91.8%]. In a pairwise meta-analysis comparing the DCV+SOC and SOC/[Placebo + SOC] consisting of 2 trials, the common and random effects models both estimated an HR of 0.3385 [0.1753; 0.6539, I^2 = 0.0%]. Comparing the PEP+SOC and SOC/[Placebo + SOC] based on 3 trials, the common effect model estimated an HR of 0.8276 [0.6960; 0.9840], while the random effects model estimated an HR of 0.3874 [0.1360; 1.1039, I^2 = 84.4%]. CONCLUSION Based on current evidence, DCV vaccines perform better than peptide-based vaccines in reducing mortality in GBM patients. Further trials are required to validate their efficacies.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Madras Medical College (IN), KPC Medical College and Hospital (IN), King George's Medical University (IN), Baptist Health South Florida (US), Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General hospital (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.