SURG-33. INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASSOUND X SODIUM FLUORESCEIN FOR GLIOMA SURGERY: WHICH IS BETTER?

Abstract BACKGROUND Improve quality of life with a maximum surgical resection is the main goal of neurosurgeons. A better delimitation of intrinsic brain tumors are required for achieving a maximum tumor removal. There are several technologies that may help. Considering two of them that have an easier access and are cheaper, we compared a high definition ultrasound (BK 3000) and sodium fluorescein (SF) during glioma surgeries. METHODS Adult patients with main radiological hypothesis of low or high grade glioma were included in a PhD study previously approved by ethics committee. 3-5mg/kg of SF was administered by intravenous infusion during anesthetic induction. An specific craniotomy transducer was used in all cases. All procedures were guided by the same neurosurgeon. RESULTS High definition ultrasound allows an excellent tumor delimitation in high and low grade tumors. However the gray scale and distinction of brain structures and residual lesion was difficult for surgeons who are not habituated to ultrasound use. SF did not help low grade glioma removal, and in these cases ultrasound were superior. Increased fluorescence is easily detected when compared to ultrasound information’s. For small residual tumor, SF helps more than US. For both technologies, when the surgical site had blood, the evaluation about grade of resection is not accurate because in ultrasound appears a posterior shadow and considering SF it seems that there are not further tumor because blood does not have increased fluorescence. CONCLUSIONS US showed superiority for low grade gliomas resection. Considering high grade, both technologies helps in different moments during the surgery and are complimentary. We used an specific probe for neurosurgery that has high quality and allowed detailed evaluations. These technologies helps surgeons take quick decision and optimized brain tumor removal. The neurosurgeon should be more familiar to US images because provide a real time evaluation with low cost. KEY WORDS: ultrasound; fluorescein; gliomas; brain tumors

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1113
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SURG-33. INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASSOUND X SODIUM FLUORESCEIN FOR GLIOMA SURGERY: WHICH IS BETTER?

Gustavo Philippi de los Santos, Aline Lariessy Campos Paiva, Jean Gonçalves de Oliveira, Renan Maximilian Lovato et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

SURG-33. INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASSOUND X SODIUM FLUORESCEIN FOR GLIOMA SURGERY: WHICH IS BETTER?

Gustavo Philippi de los Santos, Aline Lariessy Campos Paiva, Jean Gonçalves de Oliveira, Renan Maximilian Lovato, José Carlos Esteves Veiga, João Luiz Vitorino Araújo, Hiury S. Andrade, André Luca Barongeno de de Mendonça
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Improve quality of life with a maximum surgical resection is the main goal of neurosurgeons. A better delimitation of intrinsic brain tumors are required for achieving a maximum tumor removal. There are several technologies that may help. Considering two of them that have an easier access and are cheaper, we compared a high definition ultrasound (BK 3000) and sodium fluorescein (SF) during glioma surgeries. METHODS Adult patients with main radiological hypothesis of low or high grade glioma were included in a PhD study previously approved by ethics committee. 3-5mg/kg of SF was administered by intravenous infusion during anesthetic induction. An specific craniotomy transducer was used in all cases. All procedures were guided by the same neurosurgeon. RESULTS High definition ultrasound allows an excellent tumor delimitation in high and low grade tumors. However the gray scale and distinction of brain structures and residual lesion was difficult for surgeons who are not habituated to ultrasound use. SF did not help low grade glioma removal, and in these cases ultrasound were superior. Increased fluorescence is easily detected when compared to ultrasound information’s. For small residual tumor, SF helps more than US. For both technologies, when the surgical site had blood, the evaluation about grade of resection is not accurate because in ultrasound appears a posterior shadow and considering SF it seems that there are not further tumor because blood does not have increased fluorescence. CONCLUSIONS US showed superiority for low grade gliomas resection. Considering high grade, both technologies helps in different moments during the surgery and are complimentary. We used an specific probe for neurosurgery that has high quality and allowed detailed evaluations. These technologies helps surgeons take quick decision and optimized brain tumor removal. The neurosurgeon should be more familiar to US images because provide a real time evaluation with low cost. KEY WORDS: ultrasound; fluorescein; gliomas; brain tumors

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.