Comparison of two formulas for calculating intraocular lens in patients with angle-closure glaucoma

This study compares the accuracy of SRK/T and Barrett Universal II intraocular lens (IOL) measurement formulas for cataract phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation in angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) patients. Prospective serial case studies were conducted. A total of 146 patients (146 eyes) with ACG complicated with cataract who underwent cataract surgery with atrial angle closure ≤180° were observed. All the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different intraocular lens calculation formula, with 73 cases in each group (73 eyes). SRK/T intraocular lens calculation formula was used in group A, and Barrett intraocular lens calculation formula was used in group B. The visual acuity, the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central anterior chamber depth were significantly improved in 146 eyes 3 months after operation, and the differences were statistically significant. There was statistically significant difference in postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) between the 2 groups (t = 2.147, P = .033), and there was statistically significant difference in preoperative expected refraction between group A and postoperative SE (t = 4.221, P < .001). There was no significant difference between preoperative expected diopter and postoperative SE in group B (t = 1.857, P = .065). The difference in absolute predicted error between the 2 groups was statistically significant (t = 4.929, P < .001). Axis length was negatively correlated with SRK/T formula and Barrett Universal II formula absolute refractive error value (ME) (group A: r = -0.740, P < .001; group B: r = -0.532, P < .001), there was A significant negative correlation between absolute refractive error value and anterior chamber depth in both groups (group A: r = -0.382, P = .001; group B: r = -0.358, P = .002). The cataract phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation is safe and effective for ACG patients with cataract. For such patients, the Barrett Universal II intraocular lens measurement formula may be more accurate after surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040387
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of two formulas for calculating intraocular lens in patients with angle-closure glaucoma

Miaomiao Zhang, Zhonghua Sun, Jing Ma, Ji Zhen
2 citations
Medicine
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.08
article

Comparison of two formulas for calculating intraocular lens in patients with angle-closure glaucoma

Miaomiao Zhang, Zhonghua Sun, Jing Ma, Ji Zhen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study compares the accuracy of SRK/T and Barrett Universal II intraocular lens (IOL) measurement formulas for cataract phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation in angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) patients. Prospective serial case studies were conducted. A total of 146 patients (146 eyes) with ACG complicated with cataract who underwent cataract surgery with atrial angle closure ≤180° were observed. All the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different intraocular lens calculation formula, with 73 cases in each group (73 eyes). SRK/T intraocular lens calculation formula was used in group A, and Barrett intraocular lens calculation formula was used in group B. The visual acuity, the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central anterior chamber depth were significantly improved in 146 eyes 3 months after operation, and the differences were statistically significant. There was statistically significant difference in postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) between the 2 groups (t = 2.147, P = .033), and there was statistically significant difference in preoperative expected refraction between group A and postoperative SE (t = 4.221, P < .001). There was no significant difference between preoperative expected diopter and postoperative SE in group B (t = 1.857, P = .065). The difference in absolute predicted error between the 2 groups was statistically significant (t = 4.929, P < .001). Axis length was negatively correlated with SRK/T formula and Barrett Universal II formula absolute refractive error value (ME) (group A: r = -0.740, P < .001; group B: r = -0.532, P < .001), there was A significant negative correlation between absolute refractive error value and anterior chamber depth in both groups (group A: r = -0.382, P = .001; group B: r = -0.358, P = .002). The cataract phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation is safe and effective for ACG patients with cataract. For such patients, the Barrett Universal II intraocular lens measurement formula may be more accurate after surgery.

MedicineVol. 103(45)
Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan (CN), Second Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Xian Yang Central Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.