EPID-12. NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS PREDICTS SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy. Despite recent progress in treatments, prognosis for patients remain poor. Recent literature has suggested the association of GBM outcomes and socioeconomic status. However, there is limited evidence regarding the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on GBM outcomes. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on GBM outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all adult GBM patients at a single institution from 2008 to 2023. Patient addresses underwent geospatial analysis and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was extracted. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of ADI and other socioeconomic variables while controlling for a priori selected clinical variables with known relevance to survival. RESULTS In total, 1492 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 62±14.2 years with a median overall survival of 12.1 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 5-22] months. The median ADI was 66 (IQR 46-84). Patients with high socioeconomic deprivation (ADI>75) were less likely to receive chemotherapy (92% vs 96%, p=.03), and had worse overall survival compared to patients with low socioeconomic deprivation (10 vs 13 months, p=.001). In the multivariable model, patients with high ADI had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.73, p<.001). To account for changes in WHO guidelines, we implemented the model on patients diagnosed between 2017-2023 and findings were consistent (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.07-1.68, p=.011). CONCLUSIONS We present the largest study reporting the effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on overall survival of GBM patients. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status provides the most accurate capture of the patient-level socioeconomic determinants of health. Patients with higher ADI have worse overall survival after controlling for other socioeconomic and clinical variables. These results suggest significant association between neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and overall survival in GBM patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0548
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EPID-12. NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS PREDICTS SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY

Travis J. Atchley, Dagoberto Estévez-Ordoñez, James M. Markert, Burt Nabors et al.
1 citations
Neuro-Oncology
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
0.29
article

EPID-12. NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS PREDICTS SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY

Travis J. Atchley, Dagoberto Estévez-Ordoñez, James M. Markert, Burt Nabors, Yifei Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy. Despite recent progress in treatments, prognosis for patients remain poor. Recent literature has suggested the association of GBM outcomes and socioeconomic status. However, there is limited evidence regarding the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on GBM outcomes. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on GBM outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all adult GBM patients at a single institution from 2008 to 2023. Patient addresses underwent geospatial analysis and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was extracted. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of ADI and other socioeconomic variables while controlling for a priori selected clinical variables with known relevance to survival. RESULTS In total, 1492 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 62±14.2 years with a median overall survival of 12.1 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 5-22] months. The median ADI was 66 (IQR 46-84). Patients with high socioeconomic deprivation (ADI>75) were less likely to receive chemotherapy (92% vs 96%, p=.03), and had worse overall survival compared to patients with low socioeconomic deprivation (10 vs 13 months, p=.001). In the multivariable model, patients with high ADI had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.73, p<.001). To account for changes in WHO guidelines, we implemented the model on patients diagnosed between 2017-2023 and findings were consistent (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.07-1.68, p=.011). CONCLUSIONS We present the largest study reporting the effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on overall survival of GBM patients. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status provides the most accurate capture of the patient-level socioeconomic determinants of health. Patients with higher ADI have worse overall survival after controlling for other socioeconomic and clinical variables. These results suggest significant association between neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and overall survival in GBM patients.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
0.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.