Utilization or Sequestration for Captured CO<sub>2</sub> from Cement Plants?

The scope of this work is to assess the economic competitivity of optimized CO2 capture and utilization process (CCU) for e-methanol production with respect to CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS) in three locations (southern Italy, northern Germany, northeastern Egypt) and two economic scenarios (short- and long-term) for the cost of renewable energy technologies. The final aim is to determine the optimal sizing and operation of the process units of the system by minimizing the total costs to be sustained by a cement producer. At a methanol selling price of 550 €/t, which is consistent with the current market price, CCS is economically more competitive than CCU in the short-term scenario in all locations. In the long-term scenario, due to the reduced costs of renewable energy technologies, CCU becomes the preferable option in a large majority of the assessed cases. In the long-term scenario, the breakeven methanol selling price in Italy with respect to CCS was found to increase from 384 €/t to 570 €/t if low-cost hydrogen storage is not available and H2 is stored in pressurized vessels (as alternative to caverns). In Germany, from 542 €/t to 778 €/t. In Egypt, from 402 to 501 €/t. Overall, this study shows that e-methanol production from captured CO2 in European countries may be competitive with e-methanol produced in more favorable locations, such as Egypt, only in the long-term, at the condition of a substantial cost reduction of renewable energy technologies, and of the persistency of a differential cost of capital with respect to renewables-rich emerging countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02268
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilization or Sequestration for Captured CO2 from Cement Plants?

Paolo Colbertaldo, Matteo C. Romano, Federico d’Amore, Syed Ali Zaryab
3 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
0.64
article

Utilization or Sequestration for Captured CO2 from Cement Plants?

Paolo Colbertaldo, Matteo C. Romano, Federico d’Amore, Syed Ali Zaryab
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The scope of this work is to assess the economic competitivity of optimized CO2 capture and utilization process (CCU) for e-methanol production with respect to CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS) in three locations (southern Italy, northern Germany, northeastern Egypt) and two economic scenarios (short- and long-term) for the cost of renewable energy technologies. The final aim is to determine the optimal sizing and operation of the process units of the system by minimizing the total costs to be sustained by a cement producer. At a methanol selling price of 550 €/t, which is consistent with the current market price, CCS is economically more competitive than CCU in the short-term scenario in all locations. In the long-term scenario, due to the reduced costs of renewable energy technologies, CCU becomes the preferable option in a large majority of the assessed cases. In the long-term scenario, the breakeven methanol selling price in Italy with respect to CCS was found to increase from 384 €/t to 570 €/t if low-cost hydrogen storage is not available and H2 is stored in pressurized vessels (as alternative to caverns). In Germany, from 542 €/t to 778 €/t. In Egypt, from 402 to 501 €/t. Overall, this study shows that e-methanol production from captured CO2 in European countries may be competitive with e-methanol produced in more favorable locations, such as Egypt, only in the long-term, at the condition of a substantial cost reduction of renewable energy technologies, and of the persistency of a differential cost of capital with respect to renewables-rich emerging countries.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 63(46)
University of Padua (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
European Commission, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.