Survey-based inference of continental African elephant decline

Long-term quantification of temporal species trends is fundamental to the assignment of conservation status, which in turn is critical for planning and targeting management interventions. However, monitoring effort and methodologies can change over the assessment period, resulting in heterogeneous data that are difficult to interpret. Here, we develop a hierarchical, random effects Bayesian model to estimate site-level trends in density of African elephants from geographically disparate survey data. The approach treats the density trend per site as a random effect and estimates a parametric distribution of these trends for each partitioning of the data. Data were available from 475 sites, in 37 countries, between 1964 and 2016 (a total of 1,325 surveys). We implemented the model separately and in combination for the African forest (<i>Loxodonta cyclotis</i>) and savannah (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) elephant species, as well as by region. Inference from these distributions indicates a mean site-level decline for each species over the study period, with the average forest elephant decline estimated to be more than 90% compared to 70% for the savannah elephant. In combination, there has been a mean 77% decline across all sites; but in all models, substantial heterogeneity in trends was found, with stable to increasing trends more common in southern Africa. This work provides the most comprehensive assessment undertaken on the two African elephant species, illustrating the variability in their status across populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2403816121
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey-based inference of continental African elephant decline

Dave Balfour, George Wittemyer, Kathleen S. Gobush, Fiona Maisels et al.
9 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
4.13
article

Survey-based inference of continental African elephant decline

Dave Balfour, George Wittemyer, Kathleen S. Gobush, Fiona Maisels, Russell Taylor, Charles Thomas Thesen Edwards
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Long-term quantification of temporal species trends is fundamental to the assignment of conservation status, which in turn is critical for planning and targeting management interventions. However, monitoring effort and methodologies can change over the assessment period, resulting in heterogeneous data that are difficult to interpret. Here, we develop a hierarchical, random effects Bayesian model to estimate site-level trends in density of African elephants from geographically disparate survey data. The approach treats the density trend per site as a random effect and estimates a parametric distribution of these trends for each partitioning of the data. Data were available from 475 sites, in 37 countries, between 1964 and 2016 (a total of 1,325 surveys). We implemented the model separately and in combination for the African forest (<i>Loxodonta cyclotis</i>) and savannah (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) elephant species, as well as by region. Inference from these distributions indicates a mean site-level decline for each species over the study period, with the average forest elephant decline estimated to be more than 90% compared to 70% for the savannah elephant. In combination, there has been a mean 77% decline across all sites; but in all models, substantial heterogeneity in trends was found, with stable to increasing trends more common in southern Africa. This work provides the most comprehensive assessment undertaken on the two African elephant species, illustrating the variability in their status across populations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(48)
University of Stirling (GB), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), Save the Elephants (KE), University of Washington (US), Scientific Services (ZA), Colorado State University (US), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
4.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.