Camouflage or Coincidence? Investigating the Effects of Spatial and Temporal Environmental Features on Feral Cat Morphology in Tasmania

Variations in coat morphology are well documented among felids and are theorised to aid in camouflage during stalk and ambush hunting. A diverse array of coat types has arisen in <i>Felis catus</i> (feral cats) through domestication and subsequent selective breeding. This species has successfully spread across Australia over the past 200 years, raising the question of whether any specific coat types offer an adaptive advantage. We used 24,657 camera-trap images of feral cats in Tasmania, Australia, and assigned each cat observation a coat colour and pattern. We analysed these data to examine how different spatial features affect the modal coat type present at a site. We also tested if cats with differing coat types were active on different days in response to temporal features, including moon luminosity (full or new). Elevation was positively associated with the presence of orange (odds ratio = 2.5, 97.5% confidence interval = 1.5, 4.4) and tortoiseshell (odds ratio = 4.1, CI = 1.6, 10.5) cats, while blotched brown cats were negatively associated with elevation (odds ratio = 0.64, CI = 0.5, 0.9), relative to black cats. Brown mackerel cats were more common in eucalypt and rainforests (odds ratio = 1.9, CI = 1.1, 3.3), as well as sites with a higher FPAR (odds ratio = 1.3, CI = 1.1, 1.6). All coat types were 1.2-2 times more likely to be active on nights with a new moon, except for orange cats who were equally active regardless of moon luminosity (odds ratio = 0.94, CI = 0.62, 1.42). Our results indicate that coat types are equally successful across Tasmania, perhaps owing to naïve prey or limited predator competition. The high activity of orange cats irrespective of moon phase may be reflective of the male cat's tendency to patrol territory, as opposed to favouring dark nights for hunting. Future studies should consider comparing the coat types found in feral cats to adjacent domestic populations, and against a wider array of habitat types to further investigate the potential for selective pressure on feral cat coat types in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70530
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Camouflage or Coincidence? Investigating the Effects of Spatial and Temporal Environmental Features on Feral Cat Morphology in Tasmania

Alexandra J. Paton, Barry W. Brook, Jessie C. Buettel
1 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
0.46
article

Camouflage or Coincidence? Investigating the Effects of Spatial and Temporal Environmental Features on Feral Cat Morphology in Tasmania

Alexandra J. Paton, Barry W. Brook, Jessie C. Buettel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Variations in coat morphology are well documented among felids and are theorised to aid in camouflage during stalk and ambush hunting. A diverse array of coat types has arisen in <i>Felis catus</i> (feral cats) through domestication and subsequent selective breeding. This species has successfully spread across Australia over the past 200 years, raising the question of whether any specific coat types offer an adaptive advantage. We used 24,657 camera-trap images of feral cats in Tasmania, Australia, and assigned each cat observation a coat colour and pattern. We analysed these data to examine how different spatial features affect the modal coat type present at a site. We also tested if cats with differing coat types were active on different days in response to temporal features, including moon luminosity (full or new). Elevation was positively associated with the presence of orange (odds ratio = 2.5, 97.5% confidence interval = 1.5, 4.4) and tortoiseshell (odds ratio = 4.1, CI = 1.6, 10.5) cats, while blotched brown cats were negatively associated with elevation (odds ratio = 0.64, CI = 0.5, 0.9), relative to black cats. Brown mackerel cats were more common in eucalypt and rainforests (odds ratio = 1.9, CI = 1.1, 3.3), as well as sites with a higher FPAR (odds ratio = 1.3, CI = 1.1, 1.6). All coat types were 1.2-2 times more likely to be active on nights with a new moon, except for orange cats who were equally active regardless of moon luminosity (odds ratio = 0.94, CI = 0.62, 1.42). Our results indicate that coat types are equally successful across Tasmania, perhaps owing to naïve prey or limited predator competition. The high activity of orange cats irrespective of moon phase may be reflective of the male cat's tendency to patrol territory, as opposed to favouring dark nights for hunting. Future studies should consider comparing the coat types found in feral cats to adjacent domestic populations, and against a wider array of habitat types to further investigate the potential for selective pressure on feral cat coat types in Australia.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 14(11)
University of Tasmania (AU)
University of Tasmania, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.