A comprehensive survey of penicillin allergy education among United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy

Abstract Background Pharmacy students should be prepared to evaluate, manage, and de‐label penicillin allergies. It is unknown if, and to what extent, education about allergy management is included within the curriculum of United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy (USCSP). This study sought to evaluate if and how penicillin allergy education is delivered and assess faculty perceptions of student readiness. Methods A cross‐sectional, multicenter, observational survey was developed by infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy faculty and sent to ID faculty or department chairs at 138 USCSP. The 39‐item questionnaire was divided into demographics, incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy education in the program, penicillin allergy topics delivered, and respondents' perceptions of penicillin allergy education. Results The survey response rate was 53% (73/138). The USCSP demographics included established for >20 years (65.8%), curriculum length of 4 years (83.6%), semester format (74.0%), and class size of 51–100 students (42.5%). Respondents described the incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy delivery (47.9%). Targeted delivery occurred in either the required (57.5%) or elective curriculum (31.4%). Topics included definitions/epidemiology (92.8%), cross‐reactivity (92.8%), pathophysiology (88.1%), patient assessment (73.8%), skin testing (71.4%), and desensitization (71.4%). Delivery methods were lecture‐based (92.8%) and case‐based (66.7%). The median perception (scale of 1–10) of student preparedness for evaluating and managing penicillin allergies after completion of the required and elective curriculum was 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7–7.0) and 5.0 (3.0–7.3), respectively. Most (52.1%) perceived that penicillin allergy education deserves more time. Faculty from 45% of responding USCSP perceived students to be prepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies. Prepared students were more likely to have received case‐based education (54.5% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.01). Conclusion Penicillin allergy education in USCSP varies considerably. Most ID pharmacist faculty perceived that many students were unprepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies, and that more time should be allocated to penicillin allergy education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.2044
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive survey of penicillin allergy education among United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy

Meghan N. Jeffres, Mary L. Staicu, Lisa Avery, Julie Ann Justo et al.
2 citations
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
0.90
article

A comprehensive survey of penicillin allergy education among United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy

Meghan N. Jeffres, Mary L. Staicu, Lisa Avery, Julie Ann Justo, Bruce M Jones, Wesley D. Kufel, P. Brandon Bookstaver, Christopher M. Bland
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Pharmacy students should be prepared to evaluate, manage, and de‐label penicillin allergies. It is unknown if, and to what extent, education about allergy management is included within the curriculum of United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy (USCSP). This study sought to evaluate if and how penicillin allergy education is delivered and assess faculty perceptions of student readiness. Methods A cross‐sectional, multicenter, observational survey was developed by infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy faculty and sent to ID faculty or department chairs at 138 USCSP. The 39‐item questionnaire was divided into demographics, incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy education in the program, penicillin allergy topics delivered, and respondents' perceptions of penicillin allergy education. Results The survey response rate was 53% (73/138). The USCSP demographics included established for >20 years (65.8%), curriculum length of 4 years (83.6%), semester format (74.0%), and class size of 51–100 students (42.5%). Respondents described the incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy delivery (47.9%). Targeted delivery occurred in either the required (57.5%) or elective curriculum (31.4%). Topics included definitions/epidemiology (92.8%), cross‐reactivity (92.8%), pathophysiology (88.1%), patient assessment (73.8%), skin testing (71.4%), and desensitization (71.4%). Delivery methods were lecture‐based (92.8%) and case‐based (66.7%). The median perception (scale of 1–10) of student preparedness for evaluating and managing penicillin allergies after completion of the required and elective curriculum was 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7–7.0) and 5.0 (3.0–7.3), respectively. Most (52.1%) perceived that penicillin allergy education deserves more time. Faculty from 45% of responding USCSP perceived students to be prepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies. Prepared students were more likely to have received case‐based education (54.5% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.01). Conclusion Penicillin allergy education in USCSP varies considerably. Most ID pharmacist faculty perceived that many students were unprepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies, and that more time should be allocated to penicillin allergy education.

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 7(12)
Binghamton University (US), Prisma Health (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), State University of New York (US), Georgia College & State University (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Georgia (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Palmetto Health Richland (US), Upstate University Hospital (US), Novartis (United States) (US), St Joseph's Hospital Health Center (US), St. Joseph’s Candler Hospital (US), University of Montana (US), St. John Fisher University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
0.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.