Who can refuse? Attitudes About the Fertility Decisions of Wives and Husbands

This research explored Americans’ responses to dual questions from the “Constructing the Family II” survey asking if it was “all right” for wives and husbands to refuse to have children with their spouses. We reviewed the data descriptively, demographically using multinomial logistic regression, and qualitatively, investigating subset respondents’ rationales. Most respondents supported or opposed refusal equally, with only about five percent of respondents supporting refusal for one partner but not both. Among subset respondents, qualitative themes varied by refusal type and included Family Considerations , Rights , and Nuclear Family Ideals . Together, the quantitative and qualitative findings suggested that those who supported refusal for both spouses were the most egalitarian; however, these respondents along with those who supported refusal for one partner but not both were also likely to provide dissimilar, and often quite traditionally gendered, rationales. We conclude that despite surface-level egalitarianism, attitudes about fertility decision-making were not free from gendered thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Issues
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x241299421
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educational, Social, and Political Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who can refuse? Attitudes About the Fertility Decisions of Wives and Husbands

Jaclyn A. Tabor, Jamie Oslawski‐Lopez
3 citations
Journal of Family Issues
Educational, Social, and Political Issues
3.40
article

Who can refuse? Attitudes About the Fertility Decisions of Wives and Husbands

Jaclyn A. Tabor, Jamie Oslawski‐Lopez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This research explored Americans’ responses to dual questions from the “Constructing the Family II” survey asking if it was “all right” for wives and husbands to refuse to have children with their spouses. We reviewed the data descriptively, demographically using multinomial logistic regression, and qualitatively, investigating subset respondents’ rationales. Most respondents supported or opposed refusal equally, with only about five percent of respondents supporting refusal for one partner but not both. Among subset respondents, qualitative themes varied by refusal type and included Family Considerations , Rights , and Nuclear Family Ideals . Together, the quantitative and qualitative findings suggested that those who supported refusal for both spouses were the most egalitarian; however, these respondents along with those who supported refusal for one partner but not both were also likely to provide dissimilar, and often quite traditionally gendered, rationales. We conclude that despite surface-level egalitarianism, attitudes about fertility decision-making were not free from gendered thinking.

Journal of Family IssuesVol. 46(4)
Illinois College (US), Indiana University Kokomo (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational, Social, and Political Issues
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who can refuse? Attitudes About the Fertility Decisions of Wives and Husbands — Jaclyn A. Tabor, Jamie Oslawski‐Lopez · Journal of Family Issues (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS