Calibrating Bayesian generative machine learning for Bayesiamplification

Abstract Recently, combinations of generative and Bayesian deep learning have been introduced in particle physics for both fast detector simulation and inference tasks. These neural networks aim to quantify the uncertainty on the generated distribution originating from limited training statistics. The interpretation of a distribution-wide uncertainty however remains ill-defined. We show a clear scheme for quantifying the calibration of Bayesian generative machine learning models. For a Continuous Normalizing Flow applied to a low-dimensional toy example, we evaluate the calibration of Bayesian uncertainties from either a mean-field Gaussian weight posterior, or Monte Carlo sampling network weights, to gauge their behaviour on unsteady distribution edges. Well calibrated uncertainties can then be used to roughly estimate the number of uncorrelated truth samples that are equivalent to the generated sample and clearly indicate data amplification for smooth features of the distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad9136
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibrating Bayesian generative machine learning for Bayesiamplification

Mathias Trabs, Gregor Kasieczka, Sascha Diefenbacher, S. Bieringer
7 citations
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
2.43
article

Calibrating Bayesian generative machine learning for Bayesiamplification

Mathias Trabs, Gregor Kasieczka, Sascha Diefenbacher, S. Bieringer
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recently, combinations of generative and Bayesian deep learning have been introduced in particle physics for both fast detector simulation and inference tasks. These neural networks aim to quantify the uncertainty on the generated distribution originating from limited training statistics. The interpretation of a distribution-wide uncertainty however remains ill-defined. We show a clear scheme for quantifying the calibration of Bayesian generative machine learning models. For a Continuous Normalizing Flow applied to a low-dimensional toy example, we evaluate the calibration of Bayesian uncertainties from either a mean-field Gaussian weight posterior, or Monte Carlo sampling network weights, to gauge their behaviour on unsteady distribution edges. Well calibrated uncertainties can then be used to roughly estimate the number of uncorrelated truth samples that are equivalent to the generated sample and clearly indicate data amplification for smooth features of the distribution.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 5(4)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Universität Hamburg (DE)
U.S. Department of Energy, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Office of Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.